170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26536081)
1. Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.
Smith KG; Fogerty D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1805-17. PubMed ID: 26536081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integration of partial information for spoken and written sentence recognition by older listeners.
Smith KG; Fogerty D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL240. PubMed ID: 27369179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
Krull V; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining partial information from speech and text.
Fogerty D; Iftikhar I; Madorskiy R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):EL189. PubMed ID: 32113272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.
Krull V; Humes LE; Kidd GR
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 23165223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.
Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B; Myerson J; Hale S
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 20473178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.
Shafiro V; Fogerty D; Smith K; Sheft S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 30458532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recognition of Interrupted Speech, Text, and Text-Supplemented Speech by Older Adults: Effect of Interruption Rate.
Fogerty D; Madorskiy R; Vickery B; Shafiro V
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4404-4416. PubMed ID: 36251884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of Text Supplementation on Sentence Recognition and Subjective Ratings With and Without Facial Cues for Listeners With Normal Hearing.
Zhong L; Ricketts TA; Roberts RA; Picou EM
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):682-696. PubMed ID: 36534697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing multimodal spoken word-in-sentence recognition in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
Holt RF; Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):632-57. PubMed ID: 20689028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.
Fogerty D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1402-8. PubMed ID: 23838986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Context Type on Lipreading and Listening Performance and Implications for Sentence Processing.
Spehar B; Goebel S; Tye-Murray N
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):1093-102. PubMed ID: 25863923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
