These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26536081)

  • 21. The effect of modality onset asynchrony and processing time on the recognition of text-supplemented speech.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Feb; 3(2):025202. PubMed ID: 36858993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
    Başkent D; Chatterjee M
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2438-50. PubMed ID: 10491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Influence of Linguistic Proficiency on Masked Text Recognition Performance in Adults With and Without Congenital Hearing Impairment.
    Huysmans E; Bolk E; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; de Groot AM; Goverts ST
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):547-59. PubMed ID: 26974221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combined effects of form- and meaning-based predictability on perceived clarity of speech.
    Signoret C; Johnsrude I; Classon E; Rudner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 28557490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.
    Wild CJ; Yusuf A; Wilson DE; Peelle JE; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS
    J Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 32(40):14010-21. PubMed ID: 23035108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of simultaneous text on the recall of noise-degraded speech.
    Grossman I; Rajan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28263637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.
    Nittrouer S; Tarr E; Bolster V; Caldwell-Tarr A; Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):270-84. PubMed ID: 24456179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
    Kim S; Choi I; Schwalje AT; Kim K; Lee JH
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multisensory integration of speech sounds with letters vs. visual speech: only visual speech induces the mismatch negativity.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 May; 47(9):1135-1145. PubMed ID: 29537657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Categorization of sentence recognition for older adults under noisy and time-altered conditions.
    Kim S; Ma S; Lee J; Han W
    Clin Interv Aging; 2018; 13():2225-2235. PubMed ID: 30464431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Kong YY; Donaldson G; Somarowthu A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2846-57. PubMed ID: 25994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Role of Somatosensory Information in Speech Perception: Imitation Improves Recognition of Disordered Speech.
    Borrie SA; Schäfer MC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1708-16. PubMed ID: 26536172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.