These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26537714)

  • 1. Marginal integrity of restorations produced with a model composite based on polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS).
    Correa Netto LR; Borges AL; Guimarães HB; Almeida ER; Poskus LT; Silva EM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015 Oct; 23(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 26537714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate.
    Fong H; Dickens SH; Flaim GM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 15904694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of low-shrinkage dental composites containing methacrylethyl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (ME-POSS).
    Canellas TAT; de Almeida Neves A; Dos Santos IKB; de Rezende ARP; Fellows CE; da Silva EM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():566-574. PubMed ID: 30472566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of novel dental nanocomposites reinforced with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS).
    Wu X; Sun Y; Xie W; Liu Y; Song X
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 20171728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing marginal cavity adaptation of nanofiller containing resin composite restorations.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Wegner K; Utterodt A; Komatsu M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1166-75. PubMed ID: 20884047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flowable resin and marginal gap on tooth third medial cavity involving enamel and radicular cementum: a SEM evaluation of two restoration techniques.
    Lo Giudice G; Cicciù M; Cervino G; Lizio A; Visco AM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23649060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practice-based, clinical trial of a silorane-based composite resin system in posterior teeth.
    Malhotra N; Somashekar ST; Mala K; Pai V; Shenoy R
    SADJ; 2013 Sep; 68(8):358, 360-3. PubMed ID: 24660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of thermo-mechanical load cycling on silorane-based composite restorations.
    Borges AF; Santos Jde S; Ramos CM; Ishikiriama SK; Shinohara MS
    Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(6):1054-9. PubMed ID: 23207215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.