These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26538345)

  • 1. Evaluation in health promotion: thoughts from inside a human research ethics committee.
    Allen J; Flack F
    Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Dec; 26(3):182-185. PubMed ID: 26538345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and oversight of ethical health promotion quality assurance and evaluation activities involving human participants.
    Sainsbury P
    Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Dec; 26(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 26536392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research ethics for clinical researchers.
    Harnett JD; Neuman R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():19-30. PubMed ID: 25694302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability in research ethics review of cluster randomized trials: a scenario-based survey in three countries.
    Taljaard M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Boruch R; Donner A; Eccles MP; McRae AD; Saginur R; Zwarenstein M; Grimshaw JM
    Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():48. PubMed ID: 24495542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research ethics in applied anthropology.
    Marshall PA
    IRB; 1992; 14(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informing consent in New Zealand research: researchers' conflict of interest and patient vulnerability.
    Tolich M; Baldwin KM
    N Z Med J; 2005 Feb; 118(1210):U1325. PubMed ID: 15776101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical issues of informed consent in malaria research proposals submitted to a research ethics committee in Thailand: a retrospective document review.
    Adams P; Prakobtham S; Limpattaracharoen C; Suebtrakul S; Vutikes P; Khusmith S; Wilairatana P; Adams P; Kaewkungwal J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28807022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers.
    Horn AR; Weijer C; Hey SP; Brehaut J; Fergusson DA; Goldstein CE; Grimshaw J; Taljaard M
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Sep; 44(9):593-598. PubMed ID: 29703860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.
    Reynolds D; Fleming DA
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 19180385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: challenges and strategies.
    Btoush R; Campbell JC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19631063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomization can be risky.
    Lott J
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
    Brody H; Childress AM
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equipoise trumps randomization.
    Fox MD; Hellman CM; Jelley MR
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 19180383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equipoise may be in the eye of the beholder.
    Moyer A; Floyd AH
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 19180388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dirty little truth: we want them to understand, but not really..
    Morreim H
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 19180381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
    Moline ML; Aisen MW
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To study, perchance to treat.
    Trachtman H
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 19180382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research Ethics for Clinical Researchers.
    Harnett JD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():53-64. PubMed ID: 33871838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethically involving students in faculty research.
    Ferguson LM; Myrick F; Yonge O
    Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Dec; 26(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 17028074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.