186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26538410)
1. Robotic Surgery in Women With Ovarian Cancer: Surgical Technique and Evidence of Clinical Outcomes.
Minig L; Padilla Iserte P; Zorrero C; Zanagnolo V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 26538410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of robotic surgery in ovarian malignancy.
Lucidi A; Chiantera V; Gallotta V; Ercoli A; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():74-82. PubMed ID: 28602522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends.
Medlin EE; Kushner DM; Barroilhet L
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):772-81. PubMed ID: 26768315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hand-Assisted Robotic Surgery for Staging of Ovarian Cancer and Uterine Cancers With High Risk of Peritoneal Spread: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Fornalik H; Brooks H; Moore ES; Flanders NL; Callahan MJ; Sutton GP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Oct; 25(8):1488-93. PubMed ID: 26270117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of minimally invasive surgery in ovarian cancer.
Nezhat FR; Pejovic T; Finger TN; Khalil SS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):754-65. PubMed ID: 24183269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Facer B; Wang F; Grijalva CG; Alvarez RD; Shu XO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 31715149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-Site Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging Surgery for Presumed Clinically Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.
Yoo JG; Kim WJ; Lee KH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):380-381. PubMed ID: 28911827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.
Yim GW; Kim YT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 24(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 22123220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer.
Chen CH; Chiu LH; Chen HH; Chan C; Liu WM
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 25808671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Early Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Matched Control Study.
Gallotta V; Cicero C; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Petrillo M; Fagotti A; Chiantera V; Costantini B; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):293-298. PubMed ID: 27856387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
