BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540090)

  • 1. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large area CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis: Analysis, modeling, and characterization.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J; Konstantinidis AC; Patel T
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6294-308. PubMed ID: 26520722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
    Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of a novel wafer scale CMOS active pixel sensor for bio-medical imaging.
    Esposito M; Anaxagoras T; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Speller RD; Evans PM; Allinson NM; Wells K
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3533-54. PubMed ID: 24909098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
    Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
    Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Royle G; Blue A; Liang HX; Clark A; Prydderch M; Turchetta R; Speller R
    Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4612-25. PubMed ID: 18196789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
    Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
    Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
    Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-Based Modeling of a 5k Ultra-High-Resolution Medical Imaging System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Sep; 36(9):1820-1831. PubMed ID: 28436856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchrotron based planar imaging and digital tomosynthesis of breast and biopsy phantoms using a CMOS active pixel sensor.
    Szafraniec MB; Konstantinidis AC; Tromba G; Dreossi D; Vecchio S; Rigon L; Sodini N; Naday S; Gunn S; McArthur A; Olivo A
    Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 25498332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal and noise transfer properties of CMOS based active pixel flat panel imager coupled to structured CsI:Tl.
    Arvanitis CD; Bohndiek SE; Blakesley J; Olivo A; Speller RD
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 19235380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications.
    Shen Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101915. PubMed ID: 24089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.