BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540120)

  • 1. Estimating the Total Pathogenic Allele Frequency of Autosomal Recessive Disorders in Case of Consanguinity.
    Jonker MA; Teeuw ME; Kelmemi W; Kharrat M; Chaabouni-Bouhamed H; Ten Kate LP
    Hum Hered; 2015; 80(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 26540120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential impact of consanguineous marriages on autosomal recessive diseases in Tunisia.
    Ben Halim N; Hsouna S; Lasram K; Rejeb I; Walha A; Talmoudi F; Messai H; Sabrine Ben Brick A; Ouragini H; Cherif W; Nagara M; Ben Rhouma F; Chouchene I; Ouechtati F; Bouyacoub Y; Ben Rekaya M; Messaoud O; Ben Ammar S; El Matri L; Tebib N; Ben Dridi MF; Mokni M; Amouri A; Kefi R; Abdelhak S
    Am J Hum Biol; 2016; 28(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 26179682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the allele frequency of autosomal recessive disorders through mutational records and consanguinity: the Homozygosity Index (HI).
    Gialluisi A; Pippucci T; Anikster Y; Ozbek U; Medlej-Hashim M; Mégarbané A; Romeo G
    Ann Hum Genet; 2012 Mar; 76(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 22188137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consanguinity and endogamy in Northern Tunisia and its impact on non-syndromic deafness.
    Ben Arab S; Masmoudi S; Beltaief N; Hachicha S; Ayadi H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 15185405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consanguineous marriages in Morocco and the consequence for the incidence of autosomal recessive disorders.
    Jaouad IC; Elalaoui SC; Sbiti A; Elkerh F; Belmahi L; Sefiani A
    J Biosoc Sci; 2009 Sep; 41(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 19433002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.
    Chybicki IJ; Burczyk J
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18936113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic benefits of consanguinity through selection of genotypes protective against malaria.
    Denic S; Nicholls MG
    Hum Biol; 2007 Apr; 79(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 18027811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inbreeding and PKU allele frequency: Estimating by microsatellite approaches.
    Santos LL; da Fonseca CG; Vaintraub MT; Vaintraub P; Januário JN; de Aguiar MJ; Raquel Santos Carvalho M
    Am J Hum Biol; 2010; 22(5):716-9. PubMed ID: 20737622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new likelihood estimator and its comparison with moment estimators of individual genome-wide diversity.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Oct; 107(5):433-43. PubMed ID: 21522168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consanguineous marriages and endemic malaria: can inbreeding increase population fitness?
    Denic S; Nagelkerke N; Agarwal MM
    Malar J; 2008 Aug; 7():150. PubMed ID: 18673576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consanguinity in the Bishopric of Ourense (Galicia, Spain) from 1900 to 1979.
    Varela TA; Aínsua RL; Fariña J
    Ann Hum Biol; 2003; 30(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 12881141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An estimate of the average number of recessive lethal mutations carried by humans.
    Gao Z; Waggoner D; Stephens M; Ober C; Przeworski M
    Genetics; 2015 Apr; 199(4):1243-54. PubMed ID: 25697177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the genome-wide kinship coefficient seems unhelpful in distinguishing consanguineous couples with a high versus low risk for adverse reproductive outcome.
    Kelmemi W; Teeuw ME; Bochdanovits Z; Ouburg S; Jonker MA; Alkuraya F; Hashem M; Kayserili H; van Haeringen A; Sheridan E; Masri A; Cobben JM; Rizzu P; Kostense PJ; Dommering CJ; Henneman L; Bouhamed-Chaabouni H; Heutink P; Ten Kate LP; Cornel MC
    BMC Med Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():50. PubMed ID: 26188928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients.
    Robertson A; Hill WG
    Genetics; 1984 Aug; 107(4):703-18. PubMed ID: 6745643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient through use of genomic data.
    Leutenegger AL; Prum B; Génin E; Verny C; Lemainque A; Clerget-Darpoux F; Thompson EA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Sep; 73(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 12900793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rank-invariant estimation of inbreeding coefficients.
    Zhang QS; Goudet J; Weir BS
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jan; 128(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34824382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On some novel aspects of consanguineous marriages.
    Denic S; Nagelkerke N; Agarwal MM
    Public Health Genomics; 2011; 14(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 21150168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.