These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540227)

  • 1. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution?
    Oosterhuis WP; Theodorsson E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 54(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 26540227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference.
    Panteghini M; Ceriotti F; Jones G; Oosterhuis W; Plebani M; Sandberg S;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(12):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 29031018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Useful measures and models for analytical quality management in medical laboratories.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 54(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 26426893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Managing quality vs. measuring uncertainty in the medical laboratory.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19919330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of error and uncertainty methods in the medical laboratory.
    Oosterhuis WP; Bayat H; Armbruster D; Coskun A; Freeman KP; Kallner A; Koch D; Mackenzie F; Migliarino G; Orth M; Sandberg S; Sylte MS; Westgard S; Theodorsson E
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Jan; 56(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 28796637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing the use of the "state-of-the-art" performance criteria.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Streichert T
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):887-91. PubMed ID: 25803083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring Analytical Quality: Total Analytical Error Versus Measurement Uncertainty.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28153359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rhetoric Versus Reality? Laboratory Surveys Show Actual Practice Differs Considerably from Proposed Models and Mandated Calculations.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 28153368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. State-of-the-art model for derivation of analytical performance specifications: how to define the highest level of analytical performance technically achievable.
    Borrillo F; Panteghini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Jul; 62(8):1490-1496. PubMed ID: 38353168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine.
    Fraser CG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):837-40. PubMed ID: 25720125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of traceability concepts to analytical quality control may reconcile total error with uncertainty of measurement.
    Panteghini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 19995178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to define a significant deviation from the expected internal quality control result.
    Ceriotti F; Brugnoni D; Mattioli S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):913-8. PubMed ID: 25870962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty in Measurement and Total Error: Tools for Coping with Diagnostic Uncertainty.
    Theodorsson E
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 28153362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2009 convocation of experts on quality control.
    Burnett D; Ceriotti F; Cooper G; Parvin C; Plebani M; Westgard J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010; 48(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 19922240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty in measurement and total error: different roads to the same quality destination?
    Farrance I; Badrick T; Frenkel R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Nov; 56(12):2010-2014. PubMed ID: 29949508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What the Milan conference has taught us about analytical performance specification model definition and measurand allocation.
    Panteghini M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Jul; 62(8):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 38277658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What information on measurement uncertainty should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
    Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Bernardi D; Aita A; Antonelli G; Padoan A
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jul; 57():18-22. PubMed ID: 29402416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pragmatic approach to sample acceptance and rejection.
    Cadamuro J; Simundic AM; Ajzner E; Sandberg S
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Jul; 50(10-11):579-581. PubMed ID: 28163015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.
    Krouwer JS
    Clin Chem; 2002 Jun; 48(6 Pt 1):919-27. PubMed ID: 12029009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.