86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540362)
1. Comparative Microstrain Study of Internal Hexagon and Plateau Design of Short Implants Under Vertical Loading.
Nishioka RS; Rodrigues VA; De Santis LR; Nishioka GN; Santos VM; Souza FÁ
Implant Dent; 2016 Feb; 25(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 26540362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microstrain around dental implants supporting fixed partial prostheses under axial and non-axial loading conditions, in vitro strain gauge analysis.
de Vasconcellos LG; Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LM; Balducci I; Kojima AN
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):e546-51. PubMed ID: 24220463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses for external and internal hex connections and machined and plastic copings: strain gauge analysis.
de Vasconcellos LG; Kojima AN; Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LM; Balducci I
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 23574373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Straight and offset implant placement under axial and nonaxial loads in implant-supported prostheses: strain gauge analysis.
Abreu CW; Nishioka RS; Balducci I; Consani RL
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):535-9. PubMed ID: 22905920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P
Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 24614880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External hexagon and internal hexagon in straight and offset implant placement: strain gauge analysis.
Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LG; de Melo Nishioka LN
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 20009605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic fatigue performance of implant-abutment assemblies with different tightening torque values.
Xia D; Lin H; Yuan S; Bai W; Zheng G
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2143-9. PubMed ID: 25226912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses by strain gauge analysis.
Vasconcellos LG; Nishioka RS; Vasconcellos LM; Nishioka LN
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 22230995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of castable and premachined metal base abutment/implant interfaces before and after cyclical load.
De Mori R; Ribeiro CF; da Silva-Concílio LR; Claro Neves AC
Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 24637531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.
Murmura G; Di Iorio D; Cicchetti AR; Sinjari B; Caputi S
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 21231867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of stiffness of implant-abutment connection on load-deflection ratios of a screw-retained stiff cantilever beam. 3-D measurements in vitro.
Cassel B; Lundgren D; Karlsson D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22906410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Load-application devices: a comparative strain gauge analysis.
Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LG; Jóias RP; Rode Sde M
Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 26200149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of torque resistance and microgaps between a combined Octatorx-cone connection and an internal hexagon implant-abutment connection.
Khongkhunthian P; Khongkhunthian S; Weerawatprachya W; Pongpat K; Aunmeungtong W
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 25794913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
