These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540362)

  • 21. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
    Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 26050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
    Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.
    Khraisat A; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Nomura S; Miyakawa O; Elnasser Z
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16774595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prosthetic abutment influences bone biomechanical behavior of immediately loaded implants.
    Camargos Gde V; Sotto-Maior BS; Silva WJ; Lazari PC; Del Bel Cury AA
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 May; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 27253141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system.
    Clelland NL; Gilat A; McGlumphy EA; Brantley WA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 8112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of superstructure geometry on the mechanical behavior of zirconia implant abutments: a finite element analysis.
    Geringer A; Diebels S; Nothdurft FP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Dec; 59(6):501-6. PubMed ID: 25029078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?
    Siadat H; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():346-51. PubMed ID: 26237093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication.
    Maeda Y; Satoh T; Sogo M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 16409521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
    Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.