These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540471)

  • 1. Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.
    Hall C; Wang S; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 26540471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of luminance noise on the object frequencies mediating letter identification.
    Hall C; Wang S; Bhagat R; McAnany JJ
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():663. PubMed ID: 25071637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 9156226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Sep; 11(9):2375-82. PubMed ID: 7931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.
    Pelli DG; Levi DM; Chung ST
    J Vis; 2004 Oct; 4(10):904-20. PubMed ID: 15595894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Luminance noise as a novel approach for measuring contrast sensitivity within the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways.
    Hall CM; McAnany JJ
    J Vis; 2017 Jul; 17(8):5. PubMed ID: 28672370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Li RW
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1038-47. PubMed ID: 16337252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers.
    Gold J; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(21):3537-60. PubMed ID: 10746125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision.
    Chung ST; Legge GE; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2002 Aug; 42(18):2137-152. PubMed ID: 12207975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur.
    Akutsu H; Bedell HE; Patel SS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 77(10):524-30. PubMed ID: 11100890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial-frequency properties of letter identification in amblyopia.
    Chung ST; Levi DM; Legge GE; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(12):1571-81. PubMed ID: 12074951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.
    Kwon M; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 23302216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of response biases on resolution thresholds of Sloan letters in central and paracentral vision.
    Barhoom H; Joshi MR; Schmidtmann G
    Vision Res; 2021 Oct; 187():110-119. PubMed ID: 34252726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of contrast polarity on letter identification.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1993 Dec; 33(17):2491-7. PubMed ID: 8249329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1574-84. PubMed ID: 16213001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination.
    Parish DH; Sperling G
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(7-8):1399-415. PubMed ID: 1891827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.