These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. McAnany JJ; Alexander KR Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(26):2615-24. PubMed ID: 18374385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Michelson contrast, RMS contrast and energy of various spatial stimuli at threshold. Kukkonen H; Rovamo J; Tiippana K; Näsänen R Vision Res; 1993 Jul; 33(10):1431-6. PubMed ID: 8333164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contrast thresholds in additive luminance noise: Effect of noise temporal characteristics. McAnany JJ; Alexander KR Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1389-96. PubMed ID: 19007802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds. Khanani AM; Brown SM; Xu KT J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15519092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects. Westheimer G Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C. Alexander KR; McAnany JJ Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 87(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 19996815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Majaj NJ; Pelli DG; Kurshan P; Palomares M Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1165-84. PubMed ID: 11997055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test. Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion. Regan D; Hong XH Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart. Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]