These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26540471)

  • 21. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of white and filtered noise on contrast detection thresholds.
    Blackwell KT
    Vision Res; 1998 Jan; 38(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 9536353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Metamorphopsia and letter recognition.
    Wiecek E; Dakin SC; Bex P
    J Vis; 2014 Dec; 14(14):1. PubMed ID: 25453116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters.
    Oruç I; Landy MS; Pelli DG
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1493-506. PubMed ID: 16203023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(26):2615-24. PubMed ID: 18374385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Michelson contrast, RMS contrast and energy of various spatial stimuli at threshold.
    Kukkonen H; Rovamo J; Tiippana K; Näsänen R
    Vision Res; 1993 Jul; 33(10):1431-6. PubMed ID: 8333164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrast thresholds in additive luminance noise: Effect of noise temporal characteristics.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1389-96. PubMed ID: 19007802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Normal values for a clinical test of letter-recognition contrast thresholds.
    Khanani AM; Brown SM; Xu KT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2377-82. PubMed ID: 15519092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C.
    Alexander KR; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 87(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 19996815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification.
    Majaj NJ; Pelli DG; Kurshan P; Palomares M
    Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1165-84. PubMed ID: 11997055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.
    Chung ST; Tjan BS
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 17223153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Thresholds for sampled sloan letters are smaller than sample spacing.
    Carkeet A; Gerasimou DF; Parsonson LR; Biffin KL; Fredericksen BJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1142-50. PubMed ID: 19050469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
    Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion.
    Regan D; Hong XH
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial integration of band-pass filtered patterns in noise.
    Näsänen R; Kukkonen H; Rovamo J
    Vision Res; 1993 May; 33(7):903-11. PubMed ID: 8506633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.
    Pluháček F; Siderov J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29808376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of temporal resolution of object identification in human vision.
    Näsänen R; Ojanpää H; Tanskanen T; Päällysaho J
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 172(4):464-71. PubMed ID: 16491409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.