These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26541128)

  • 1. Archive or Discard Computer-Aided Detection Markings: Two Schools of Thought.
    Berlin L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1134-5. PubMed ID: 26541128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal Ramifications of Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography.
    Mezrich JL; Siegel EL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 25547380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Authors' Reply.
    Mezrich JL; Siegel E
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1135-6. PubMed ID: 26541129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the legal risk of a 'missed' cancer in two breastscreen services.
    Osborne J; Lee W
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Feb; 54(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 20377711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Legal liability of the radiologist in missed breast cancer diagnosis].
    Mortier M; Villeirs G
    JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12693376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer aided mammography gets ahead of the evidence.
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2387. PubMed ID: 23596219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection as evidence in the courtroom: potential implications of an appellate court's ruling.
    Brenner RJ; Ulissey MJ; Wilt RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 16357376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Not Available].
    Rofo; 2017 Aug; 189(8):786-790. PubMed ID: 28704873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of malpractice claims in mammography: a complex issue.
    Fileni A; Magnavita N; Pescarini L
    Radiol Med; 2009 Jun; 114(4):636-44. PubMed ID: 19444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Not Available].
    Rofo; 2020 Mar; 192(3):283-286. PubMed ID: 32074644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STORM, a new dimension for mammography screening.
    Houssami N
    Med J Aust; 2013 Sep; 199(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 23992172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonspecific findings confound screening for breast cancer.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Mar; 22(3):41-2, 45-6. PubMed ID: 10947282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. System malfunction.
    Avery JK
    Tenn Med; 2009 Oct; 102(10):31. PubMed ID: 19899316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New York court rejects liability theory. Megally v. LaPorta.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Dec; 17(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 10724624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Omission of mammography screening as a gross treatment error].
    Wigge P
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1108-10. PubMed ID: 24150769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An appellate court ruling and potential implications for CAD technology in the courtroom.
    Greenberg JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 16357377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicolegal-Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):W92-W93. PubMed ID: 29355404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Malpractice issues in radiology. Emerging technologies.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 10430116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comments on "Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists".
    Freedman MT
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):507-8. PubMed ID: 19551501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition.
    Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):811-2. PubMed ID: 16696454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.