These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26541128)

  • 41. Consistency of lesion size in digital mammography.
    Clunie DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):W257; author reply W258. PubMed ID: 20729426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. MEDIOCOLEGAL--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W110. PubMed ID: 25539264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Editorial comment: legal liability in atypical aortic dissection.
    Elefteriades JA
    Cardiol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):253-4. PubMed ID: 20452537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Misdiagnosis leading to the loss or diminution of the chance of recovery or survival: any remedy?
    Samuels A
    Med Leg J; 2005; 73(Pt 3):115-7. PubMed ID: 16235756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mammographic CAD markings: archive or discard?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W659. PubMed ID: 21512059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improved sensitivity of mammography with computer-aided detection.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1598; author reply 1598-9. PubMed ID: 15150018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How not to assess computer-aided detection for mammography.
    Guenin MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1599; author reply 1599-600. PubMed ID: 15150019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Re: effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
    Levman J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jan; 104(1):77-8; author reply 78-9. PubMed ID: 22186179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation?
    Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19789251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
    Birdwell RL
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19789250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fear of cancer.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 15269009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Potential Benefits of Computer-Aided Detection for Cancer Identification and Treatment.
    Brem R
    JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Mar; 176(3):410. PubMed ID: 26954044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Medicolegal-malpractice and ethical issues in radiology: reporting the "missed" radiologic diagnosis.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):W516. PubMed ID: 23971484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Is It Time to Stop Paying for Computer-Aided Mammography?
    Fenton JJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1837-8. PubMed ID: 26414612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Potential Benefits of Computer-Aided Detection for Cancer Identification and Treatment-Reply.
    Lehman C
    JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Mar; 176(3):411. PubMed ID: 26954046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Computer aided mammography yields no clear benefit, research finds.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h5164. PubMed ID: 26419394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography: improving performance or simply shifting the operating point?
    Sumkin JH; Gur D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):916-7; author reply 917-8. PubMed ID: 16714469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Feig SA; Sickles EA; Evans WP; Linver MN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261. PubMed ID: 15316065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.