These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26541289)
1. Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis. Prifti E; Bonacchi M; Ademaj F; Giunti G; Esposito G; Baboci A; Bajraktari G; Veshti A; Demiraj A; Vanini V J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Nov; 10():154. PubMed ID: 26541289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early and Mid-term Outcome of the St. Jude Medical Regent 19-mm Aortic Valve Mechanical Prosthesis. Functional and Haemodynamic Evaluation. Prifti E; Bonacchi M; Minardi G; Krakulli K; Baboci A; Esposito G; Demiraj A; Zeka M; Rruci E Heart Lung Circ; 2018 Feb; 27(2):235-247. PubMed ID: 28400190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early and mid-term functional and hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical Regent 17 mm aortic valve mechanical prosthesis. Prifti E; Bonacchi M; Baboci A; Krakulli K; Giunti G J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jan; 23(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 24779337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the St. Jude Regent 17-mm Offer Better Outcomes Than the Hemodynamic Plus 17-mm Aortic Valve Mechanical Prothesis? Prifti E; Bonacchi M; Baboci A; Giunti G; Esposito G; Kajo E; Nuellari E; Vanini V J Card Surg; 2015 Nov; 30(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 26447362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamics of 17-mm vs. 19-mm St. Jude Medical Regent and annulus enlargement. Prifti E; Bonacchi M; Baboci A; Giunti G; Esposito G; Krakulli K; Ademaj F; Kajo E; Vanini V Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Jul; 23(6):670-83. PubMed ID: 25931567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus. Mizoguchi H; Sakaki M; Inoue K; Iwata T; Tei K; Miura T Heart Vessels; 2013 Nov; 28(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 23160858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early in vivo hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valve in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Gelsomino S; Morocutti G; Da Col P; Masullo G; Carella R; Guzzi G; Spedicato L; Livi U J Card Surg; 2003; 18(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 12757339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study. Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. Dellgren G; David TE; Raanani E; Armstrong S; Ivanov J; Rakowski H J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jul; 124(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 12091820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome. Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Caes F; Van Overbeke H; Van Nooten G Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 30(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 16950630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve is a valid option for patients with a small aortic annulus. Okamura H; Yamaguchi A; Tanaka M; Naito K; Kimura N; Kimura C; Kobinata T; Ino T; Adachi H Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 87(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 19101276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal results of aortic valve replacement with small mechanical valves (< 19 mm). Kato Y; Hattori K; Motoki M; Takahashi Y; Kotani S; Nishimura S; Shibata T J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jul; 22(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24224408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis. Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve. Okamura H; Yamaguchi A; Nagano H; Itoh S; Morita H; Naito K; Yuri K; Adachi H Circ J; 2012; 76(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 22130314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Regent mechanical valve in patients with small aortic annulus: 3-year follow-up. Zhao D; Wang C; Hong T; Pan C; Guo C J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 7():88. PubMed ID: 22999490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mid-long-term clinical results and hemodynamic evaluation of aortic valve replacement with 17 mm St. Jude medical regent valve]. Liu Y; Zhang EY; Fang Z; Gu J; Qian H Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Mar; 44(2):316-8, 326. PubMed ID: 23745280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical research of aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus]. Wang R; Chen X; Xu M; Jiang Y; Wang L; Liu P Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Feb; 52(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 24809523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]