These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 265414)
21. Doctors, families and difficult decisions: the implications of the Lawrance case. Nocon JJ Indiana Med; 1991 Nov; 84(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 1761855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient. Norris JA Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. After Quinlan and Saikewicz: death, life, and God committees. Savage D Crit Care Med; 1980 Feb; 8(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 7353392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis. Murphy JG Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Hospital ethics committees: is there a role? Veatch RM Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Jun; 7(3):22-5. PubMed ID: 873774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Decision making about medical innovation: the role of the advocate. Rouse F Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 11652856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Quinlan decision: five commentaries. Disconnection: the clinician's view. Levine MD Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Feb; 6(1):11-12. PubMed ID: 1254449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Non-intervention in children with major handicaps. Legal and ethical issues. Aust Paediatr J; 1983 Dec; 19(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6201157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases. Hafemeister TL Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. What is extraordinary life support? Jonsen AR West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 6506674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Massachusetts approves no-code orders. Waring R Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Feb; 7(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 431273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Judge rules for respirator use and traditional medical standards. Regier H J Leg Med (N Y); 1975; 3(10):12-4. PubMed ID: 1081565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The tragic case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Healey JM Conn Med; 1979 Jun; 43(6):399. PubMed ID: 11643501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. After Quinlan. Kittredge FI J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 May; 4(5):28-31. PubMed ID: 1084388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Quinlan case: death decision by committee. Annas GJ New Physician; 1979 Feb; 28(2):53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 10240660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]