These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26541860)

  • 1. Making decisions about colorectal cancer screening. A qualitative study among citizens with lower educational attainment.
    Kirkegaard P; Mortensen GL; Mortensen SL; Larsen MB; Gabel P; Andersen B
    Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 26541860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Gabel P; Larsen MB; Kirkegaard P; Edwards A; Andersen B
    Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):543. PubMed ID: 30305114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The LEAD trial-The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial.
    Gabel P; Edwards A; Kirkegaard P; Larsen MB; Andersen B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Feb; 103(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 31451360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.
    Smith SK; Simpson JM; Trevena LJ; McCaffery KJ
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):756-72. PubMed ID: 24421292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.
    Smith SK; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; Barratt A; McCaffery KJ
    Health Expect; 2008 Jun; 11(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 18494957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening-a qualitative study in an ethnic and socio-economically diverse inner city population.
    Dharni N; Armstrong D; Chung-Faye G; Wright AJ
    Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):608-617. PubMed ID: 27550367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.
    Smith SK; Dixon A; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; McCaffery KJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(12):1805-12. PubMed ID: 19846245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative Study.
    Gabel P; Kirkegaard P; Larsen MB; Edwards A; Andersen B
    JMIR Form Res; 2018 May; 2(1):e9. PubMed ID: 30684402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.
    Smith SK; Kearney P; Trevena L; Barratt A; Nutbeam D; McCaffery KJ
    Health Expect; 2014 Aug; 17(4):511-22. PubMed ID: 22512746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].
    Seidel G; Münch I; Dreier M; Borutta B; Walter U; Dierks ML
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Mar; 57(3):366-79. PubMed ID: 24562713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.
    Wackerbarth SB; Tarasenko YN; Joyce JM; Haist SA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Apr; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 17098393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices preferences for decision making.
    Messina CR; Lane DS; Grimson R
    Am J Prev Med; 2005 Jun; 28(5):439-46. PubMed ID: 15894147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial.
    Gabel P; Larsen MB; Edwards A; Kirkegaard P; Andersen B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241703. PubMed ID: 33170877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a decision aid to support colorectal cancer screening: perspectives of Asians in an endemic urban community-a qualitative research study.
    Yuen SWJ; Tay TY; Gao N; Tho NQ; Tan NC
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Mar; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 33676504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
    Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 25128051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.
    Wong MC; John GK; Hirai HW; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ching JY; Ng SS; Chan FK; Griffiths SM; Sung JJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 22836914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health educational background as a predictor of non-participation in national colorectal cancer screening: A cross-sectional population study among 886,088 invited Danes.
    Deding U; Vardinghus-Nielsen H; Torp-Pedersen C; Bøggild H
    Prev Med; 2019 Aug; 125():69-76. PubMed ID: 31150740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects by educational attainment of a mammography screening patient decision aid for women aged 75 years and older.
    Cadet T; Pinheiro A; Karamourtopoulos M; Jacobson AR; Aliberti GM; Kistler CE; Davis RB; Schonberg MA
    Cancer; 2021 Dec; 127(23):4455-4463. PubMed ID: 34374430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do we achieve informed choice for women considering breast screening?
    Hersch J; Jansen J; Irwig L; Barratt A; Thornton H; Howard K; McCaffery K
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):144-6. PubMed ID: 21723312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
    Baena-Cañada JM; Luque-Ribelles V; Quílez-Cutillas A; Rosado-Varela P; Benítez-Rodríguez E; Márquez-Calderón S; Rivera-Bautista JM
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e019852. PubMed ID: 29730621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.