249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26542373)
1. Comparison of thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis with McKeown esophagectomy for middle esophageal cancer.
Huang HT; Wang F; Shen L; Xia CQ; Lu CX; Zhong CJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 13():310. PubMed ID: 26542373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of postoperative complications on survival of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Tan QY; Jiang YG; Guo W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 27924395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of thoracoscopy-assisted surgery with a minithoracotomy and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single surgeon.
Kunisaki C; Kosaka T; Ono HA; Oshima T; Fujii S; Takagawa R; Kimura J; Tokuhisa M; Izumisawa Y; Makino H; Akiyama H; Endo I
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Nov; 15(11):1939-51. PubMed ID: 21909843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Lin D; Ye T; Ma L; Shao L; Song Z; Jiang S; Xiang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 27680065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy.
Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma.
Yu L; Wu JX; Gao YS; Li JY; Zhang YF; Ke J
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2382-9. PubMed ID: 26416374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.
Chen J; Wu S; Zheng X; Pan J; Zhu K; Chen Y; Li J; Liao L; Lin Y; Liao Z
BMC Surg; 2014 Dec; 14():110. PubMed ID: 25527100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.
Palanivelu C; Prakash A; Senthilkumar R; Senthilnathan P; Parthasarathi R; Rajan PS; Venkatachlam S
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 16798482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy between robot-assisted and thoracoscopy-laparoscopy-assisted radical esophageal cancer surgery].
He ZF; Zheng TL; Liu DL; Yang Y; Zhu DY; Wu K; Wang LP; Zhao S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 32306608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Goan YG; Chang HC; Hsu HK; Chou YP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Mar; 31(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 17222561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
Yao F; Wang J; Yao J; Xu L; Qian J; Cao Y
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():105-109. PubMed ID: 29061388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.
Yamashita K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Tanaka K; Hara T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1-8. PubMed ID: 28881906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of subcarinal dissection on short-term outcome and survival following esophagectomy.
Hu W; Liang Y; Zhang S; Hu Y; Liu J
Am J Surg; 2013 Sep; 206(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 23809670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
