BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26542556)

  • 1. RESEARCH ETHICS. Evidence gaps and ethical review of multicenter studies.
    Ervin AM; Taylor HA; Meinert CL; Ehrhardt S
    Science; 2015 Nov; 350(6261):632-3. PubMed ID: 26542556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Ethics of observational studies: are specific rules useful?].
    Rosmini F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(4-5):295-7. PubMed ID: 17176945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research ethics committees; good clinical practice; advance directives.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2005; (209):8-11. PubMed ID: 16830431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.
    Fitzpatrick KL; Boult M; Fitridge RA
    Med J Aust; 2010 Mar; 192(5):293. PubMed ID: 20306547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do all services provided as part of a clinical trial require research ethics and governance review?
    Kenner J; Zalcberg JR
    Intern Med J; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1197-1199. PubMed ID: 28994255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A case study of a single ethics committee for multicentre trials.
    Olver IN; Falleiro SJ; Marson ML; Bishop JF
    Med J Aust; 2011 Nov; 195(10):582-3. PubMed ID: 22107003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics review of multi-centre clinical trials in Canada.
    Enzle ME; Schmaltz R
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):51-7. PubMed ID: 16459414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple competing interests surround ethical review of clinical trials.
    Henderson D
    Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):686-7. PubMed ID: 16248869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement.
    Edwards SJ; Ashcroft R; Kirchin S
    Bioethics; 2004 Sep; 18(5):408-27. PubMed ID: 15462024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heterogeneity in the evaluation of observational studies by Italian ethics committees.
    Santarlasci B; Messori A; Pelagotti F; Trippoli S; Vaiani M
    Pharm World Sci; 2005 Feb; 27(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 15861926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study.
    Hearnshaw H
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7432):140-1. PubMed ID: 14726341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics.
    Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ
    IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for promoting international multi-site clinical trials-from a viewpoint of ethics review.
    Nakada H; Hasthorpe S; IJsselmuiden C; Kombe F; Ba M; Matei M; Nakamura K; Ushirozawa N; Fujiwara Y; Tashiro S
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Dec; 19(4):192-195. PubMed ID: 31513337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who watches the watchmen?
    Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7359):125. PubMed ID: 21833048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicentre drug trials, ethics approval and death of patients.
    Millar JA
    Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):298-9; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based practice of research ethics review?
    Beagan B; McDonald M
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 16459416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in multicentre ethics review.
    Irvine R
    Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):297-8; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
    Lingler JH; Parker LS; DeKosky ST; Schulz R
    IRB; 2006; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growing pains: central review board project still developing.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 May; 95(9):636-7. PubMed ID: 12734305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.