447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26542761)
1. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.
Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs.
Semins MJ; George S; Allaf ME; Matlaga BR
J Endourol; 2009 Jun; 23(6):903-5. PubMed ID: 19445639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techniques to maximize flexible ureteroscope longevity.
Pietrow PK; Auge BK; Delvecchio FC; Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Albala DM; Preminger GM
Urology; 2002 Nov; 60(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 12429296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.
Marchini GS; Torricelli FC; Batagello CA; Monga M; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):658-670. PubMed ID: 31397987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Kim DH; Shin JH; Choi SY; You D; Kim CS; Park HK
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Sep; 59(5):328-334. PubMed ID: 30182078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fiberoptic versus Digital: A Comparison of Durability and Cost Effectiveness of the Two Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Temiz MZ; Colakerol A; Ertas K; Tuken M; Yuruk E
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 30463076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.
Isaacson D; Ahmad T; Metzler I; Tzou DT; Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Zetumer S; Sherer B; Stoller M; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 28830223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying factors associated with need for flexible ureteroscope repair: a Western Endourology STone (WEST) research consortium prospective cohort study.
Taguchi K; Harper JD; Stoller ML; Duty BD; Sorensen MD; Sur RL; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Wenzler DL; Isaacson D; Xu A; Chu C; Zaid UB; Taylor ER; Ramaswamy K; Chi T
Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):559-566. PubMed ID: 29224057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.
Knudsen B; Miyaoka R; Shah K; Holden T; Turk TM; Pedro RN; Kriedberg C; Hinck B; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Monga M
Urology; 2010 Mar; 75(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 19854494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy in outpatient surgery.
Oitchayomi A; Doerfler A; Le Gal S; Chawhan C; Tillou X
BMC Urol; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26822017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Evaluation of Miniature Flexible Scope for Diagnosis of Ureteroscope Working Channel Defects.
Chen TT; Nguyen MV; Cerrato C; Berger JH; Vartanian KB; Gerrity JJ; Sur RL; Bechis SK; Monga M
J Endourol; 2023 Jun; 37(6):628-633. PubMed ID: 36974366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
