These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2654367)

  • 1. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Fareed K; Adams WK; Tanquist RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 2654367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative materials for three endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Adams WK; Kinzel GL; Brose MO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 2724166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants.
    van Rossen IP; Braak LH; de Putter C; de Groot K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 2202819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant.
    Kitagawa T; Tanimoto Y; Nemoto K; Aida M
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Jun; 24(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 16022442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H; Schoen FJ
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 378283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress and strain distribution in the bone surrounding a new design of dental implant: a comparison with a threaded Branemark type implant.
    Clift SE; Fisher J; Watson CJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1993; 207(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 8117364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant.
    Geng JP; Xu DW; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15453222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 6987233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.
    Clelland NL; Ismail YH; Zaki HS; Pipko D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 1820307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
    Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.