These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26543855)

  • 21. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
    Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
    Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique.
    Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 23102564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contributing factors to intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment as a relapse factor after mandibular setback with sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23830770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predisposing conditions for condylar sag after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Rokutanda S; Yamada SI; Yanamoto S; Sakamoto H; Omori K; Rokutanda H; Yoshimi T; Fujishita A; Morita Y; Yoshida N; Umeda M
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10463. PubMed ID: 34001999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of patient- and operation-related factors on postoperative pain after orthognathic surgery.
    Chen CM; Lai SS; Chen HS; Hsu KR; Lai YH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):724-7. PubMed ID: 22565886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.
    Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
    Choung PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992; 20(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 1629365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on stress distribution of temporomandibular joints in patients with mandibular prognathism under symmetric occlusions.
    Ma H; Shu J; Wang Q; Teng H; Liu Z
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Dec; 23(16):1297-1305. PubMed ID: 32696672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Major factors contributing to anterior and posterior relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Choi SH; Kang DY; Cha JY; Jung YS; Yu HS; Park HS; Hwang CJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 44(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 26897301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The chronologic prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders associated with bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Jung HD; Jung YS; Park HS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 19304037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of mandibular setback on the temporomandibular joint: a comparison of oblique and sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Hu J; Wang D; Zou S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 58(4):375-80; discussion 380-1. PubMed ID: 10759116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite.
    Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hemorrhage following mandibular osteotomies: a report of 21 cases.
    Lanigan DT; Hey J; West RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Jul; 49(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 2056370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Changes in the sensitivity of cutaneous points and the oral mucosa after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Hasegawa T; Tateishi C; Asano M; Takata N; Akashi M; Shigeta T; Furudoi S; Shibuya Y; Komori T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1454-61. PubMed ID: 23706290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Rokutanda S; Yamada S; Yanamoto S; Omori K; Fujimura Y; Morita Y; Rokutanda H; Kohara H; Fujishita A; Nakamura T; Yoshimi T; Yoshida N; Umeda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Condylar and disc positions after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Hashiba Y; Shimizu C; Nakgawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17239565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the amount of mandibular setback during bimaxillary surgery correlate with the degree of surgical relapse?
    Takahara N; Kimura A; Tomomatsu N; Nakakuki K; Yoda T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 May; 129(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 32102761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of lower lip hypoesthesia measured by trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential between different types of mandibular osteotomies and fixation.
    Hashiba Y; Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Shimizu C; Alam S; Nakagawa K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Aug; 104(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 17448708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.