158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26544160)
21. Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols.
Zhang Y; Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3404-23. PubMed ID: 22755721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comprehensive method for calculating patient effective dose and other dosimetric quantities from CT DICOM images.
Tsalafoutas IA; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 22733904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.
Einstein AJ; Elliston CD; Arai AE; Chen MY; Mather R; Pearson GD; Delapaz RL; Nickoloff E; Dutta A; Brenner DJ
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 20177085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. All about FAX: a Female Adult voXel phantom for Monte Carlo calculation in radiation protection dosimetry.
Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW; Loureiro EC; Lima VJ; Lima FR; Hoff G
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5203-16. PubMed ID: 15656272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of protocol and obesity on dose conversion factors in adult body CT.
Li X; Samei E; Williams CH; Segars WP; Tward DJ; Miller MI; Ratnanather JT; Paulson EK; Frush DP
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6550-71. PubMed ID: 23127050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relationships between physical dose quantities and patient dose in CT.
Hidajat N; Mäurer J; Schröder RJ; Nunnemann A; Wolf M; Pauli K; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 72(858):556-61. PubMed ID: 10560337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64).
Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Dewey M; de Roos A; Zankl M; Cantera AC; Artells MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21512080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computing effective dose in cardiac CT.
Huda W; Tipnis S; Sterzik A; Schoepf UJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3675-84. PubMed ID: 20530853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination.
Lee C; Lee C; Staton RJ; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1858-73. PubMed ID: 17555267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. How to Appropriately Calculate Effective Dose for CT Using Either Size-Specific Dose Estimates or Dose-Length Product.
Brady SL; Mirro AE; Moore BM; Kaufman RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):953-8. PubMed ID: 25729893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. SimDoseCT: dose reporting software based on Monte Carlo simulation for a 320 detector-row cone-beam CT scanner and ICRP computational adult phantoms.
Cros M; Joemai RMS; Geleijns J; Molina D; Salvadó M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(15):6304-6321. PubMed ID: 28590940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimates of effective dose for CT scans of the lower extremities.
Saltybaeva N; Jafari ME; Hupfer M; Kalender WA
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 24937693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. CT effective dose per dose length product using ICRP 103 weighting factors.
Huda W; Magill D; He W
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1261-5. PubMed ID: 21520838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Monoenergetic Photon Organ Dose Rate Coefficients for the Female Stylized and Voxel Phantoms Submerged in Air.
Hiller M; Dewji SA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jul; 175(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 28204766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations.
Khursheed A; Hillier MC; Shrimpton PC; Wall BF
Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):819-30. PubMed ID: 12381691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A pilot study of patient-specific cardiovascular MDCT dose maps and their utility in estimating patient-specific organ and effective doses in obese patients.
Thompson CM; Yanof JH; Wiegert J; Bullen J; Obuchowski N; Yaddanapudi K; Halliburton SS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 26853972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PATIENT-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES IN DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION EXAMINATION.
Sundell VM; Kortesniemi M; Siiskonen T; Kosunen A; Rosendahl S; Büermann L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Jan; 193(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 33693932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of z overscanning on normalized effective doses calculated for pediatric patients undergoing multidetector CT examinations.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Karantanas A; Karabekios S; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17500447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
