These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26544974)

  • 1. A New Extension of the Binomial Error Model for Responses to Items of Varying Difficulty in Educational Testing and Attitude Surveys.
    Wiley JA; Martin JL; Herschkorn SJ; Bond J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141981. PubMed ID: 26544974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction: A New Extension of the Binomial Error Model for Responses to Items of Varying Difficulty in Educational Testing and Attitude Surveys.
    Wiley JA; Martin JL; Herschkorn SJ; Bond J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144563. PubMed ID: 26633183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item Response Thresholds Models: A General Class of Models for Varying Types of Items.
    Tutz G
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1238-1269. PubMed ID: 35476176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stochastic EM for estimating the parameters of a multilevel IRT model.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):65-81. PubMed ID: 12803822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches.
    MacCann RG
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Instruction Affect the Underlying Dimensionality of a Kinesiology Test?
    Bezruczko N; Frank E; Perkins K
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):393-415. PubMed ID: 28009588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for Local Dependence with the Rasch Model: The Paradox of Information Increase.
    Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):262-282. PubMed ID: 28027051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the Rasch Model and k-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm for Response Classification.
    Paolino JP
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 28009583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.
    Karabatsos G
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(3):191-221. PubMed ID: 9711021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generalized longitudinal mixture IRT model for measuring differential growth in learning environments.
    Kadengye DT; Ceulemans E; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Sep; 46(3):823-40. PubMed ID: 24258320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models.
    Sheu CF; Chen CT; Su YH; Wang WC
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 May; 37(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 16171193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric evaluation of a knowledge based examination using Rasch analysis: an illustrative guide: AMEE guide no. 72.
    Tavakol M; Dennick R
    Med Teach; 2013; 35(1):e838-48. PubMed ID: 23137252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.
    Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample Size and Probability Threshold Considerations with the Tailored Data Method.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 28027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Item banking: a generational change in patient-reported outcome measurement.
    Pesudovs K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Apr; 87(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 20142792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The recovery of the density scale using a stochastic quasi-realization of additive conjoint measurement.
    Pelton TW; Bunderson CV
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 12904677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping Unobserved Item-Respondent Interactions: A Latent Space Item Response Model with Interaction Map.
    Jeon M; Jin IH; Schweinberger M; Baugh S
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):378-403. PubMed ID: 33939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.