BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26545077)

  • 1. Nucleosome Stability Distinguishes Two Different Promoter Types at All Protein-Coding Genes in Yeast.
    Kubik S; Bruzzone MJ; Jacquet P; Falcone JL; Rougemont J; Shore D
    Mol Cell; 2015 Nov; 60(3):422-34. PubMed ID: 26545077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing nucleosome architecture and stability at promoters: Roles of pioneer transcription factors and the RSC chromatin remodeler.
    Kubik S; Bruzzone MJ; Shore D
    Bioessays; 2017 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 28345796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fragile Nucleosomes Influence Pol II Promoter Function.
    Pradhan SK; Xue Y; Carey MF
    Mol Cell; 2015 Nov; 60(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 26545072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequence-Directed Action of RSC Remodeler and General Regulatory Factors Modulates +1 Nucleosome Position to Facilitate Transcription.
    Kubik S; O'Duibhir E; de Jonge WJ; Mattarocci S; Albert B; Falcone JL; Bruzzone MJ; Holstege FCP; Shore D
    Mol Cell; 2018 Jul; 71(1):89-102.e5. PubMed ID: 29979971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The chromatin remodelers RSC and ISW1 display functional and chromatin-based promoter antagonism.
    Parnell TJ; Schlichter A; Wilson BG; Cairns BR
    Elife; 2015 Mar; 4():e06073. PubMed ID: 25821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nucleosomes Are Essential for Proper Regulation of a Multigated Promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Yarrington RM; Goodrum JM; Stillman DJ
    Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):551-63. PubMed ID: 26627840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RSC-Associated Subnucleosomes Define MNase-Sensitive Promoters in Yeast.
    Brahma S; Henikoff S
    Mol Cell; 2019 Jan; 73(2):238-249.e3. PubMed ID: 30554944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast.
    Lee W; Tillo D; Bray N; Morse RH; Davis RW; Hughes TR; Nislow C
    Nat Genet; 2007 Oct; 39(10):1235-44. PubMed ID: 17873876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast.
    Bernstein BE; Liu CL; Humphrey EL; Perlstein EO; Schreiber SL
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(9):R62. PubMed ID: 15345046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of SUC2 promoter structure by nucleosome scanning.
    Chang J; Vancura A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 809():321-33. PubMed ID: 22113286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nucleosome repositioning underlies dynamic gene expression.
    Nocetti N; Whitehouse I
    Genes Dev; 2016 Mar; 30(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 26966245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two distinct promoter architectures centered on dynamic nucleosomes control ribosomal protein gene transcription.
    Knight B; Kubik S; Ghosh B; Bruzzone MJ; Geertz M; Martin V; Dénervaud N; Jacquet P; Ozkan B; Rougemont J; Maerkl SJ; Naef F; Shore D
    Genes Dev; 2014 Aug; 28(15):1695-709. PubMed ID: 25085421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of an intervening promoter nucleosome on gene expression.
    Parikh RY; Kim HD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63072. PubMed ID: 23700413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active PHO5 chromatin encompasses variable numbers of nucleosomes at individual promoters.
    Jessen WJ; Hoose SA; Kilgore JA; Kladde MP
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 16491089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcription factor binding site positioning in yeast: proximal promoter motifs characterize TATA-less promoters.
    Erb I; van Nimwegen E
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24279. PubMed ID: 21931670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Chromatin structure and transcription regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae].
    Osipov SA; Preobrazhenskaia OV; Karpov VL
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2010; 44(6):966-79. PubMed ID: 21290820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.
    Ozonov EA; van Nimwegen E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(8):e1003181. PubMed ID: 23990766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fine Chromatin-Driven Mechanism of Transcription Interference by Antisense Noncoding Transcription.
    Gill JK; Maffioletti A; García-Molinero V; Stutz F; Soudet J
    Cell Rep; 2020 May; 31(5):107612. PubMed ID: 32375040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nucleosome fragility reveals novel functional states of chromatin and poises genes for activation.
    Xi Y; Yao J; Chen R; Li W; He X
    Genome Res; 2011 May; 21(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 21363969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nucleosome stability at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters correlates with differential cofactor requirements for chromatin opening.
    Hertel CB; Längst G; Hörz W; Korber P
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 25(24):10755-67. PubMed ID: 16314501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.