These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26545153)

  • 1. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO
    Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.
    Vanneste J; Van Gerven T; Vander Putten E; Van der Bruggen B; Helsen L
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3595-602. PubMed ID: 21719072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.
    Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of lignin in reducing life-cycle carbon emissions, water use, and cost for United States cellulosic biofuels.
    Scown CD; Gokhale AA; Willems PA; Horvath A; McKone TE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(15):8446-55. PubMed ID: 24988448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life cycle inventory of CO2 in an enhanced oil recovery system.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; McCoy ST
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8027-32. PubMed ID: 19924918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofuel Options for Marine Applications: Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Analyses.
    Tan ECD; Hawkins TR; Lee U; Tao L; Meyer PA; Wang M; Thompson T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 55(11):7561-7570. PubMed ID: 33998807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life-cycle analysis of bio-based aviation fuels.
    Han J; Elgowainy A; Cai H; Wang MQ
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 150():447-56. PubMed ID: 23978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
    Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.
    Abrahams LS; Samaras C; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3237-45. PubMed ID: 25650513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to address data gaps in life cycle inventories: a case study on estimating CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity plants on a global scale.
    Steinmann ZJ; Venkatesh A; Hauck M; Schipper AM; Karuppiah R; Laurenzi IJ; Huijbregts MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(9):5282-9. PubMed ID: 24749645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomass pellets for power generation in India: a techno-economic evaluation.
    Purohit P; Chaturvedi V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(29):29614-29632. PubMed ID: 30141169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-carbon electricity generation-based dynamic equilibrium strategy for carbon dioxide emissions reduction in the coal-fired power enterprise.
    Xu J; Feng Q; Lv C; Huang Q
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(36):36732-36753. PubMed ID: 31741269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.