These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26545318)

  • 1. Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis versus Repeat Donor Keratoplasty for Corneal Graft Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ahmad S; Mathews PM; Lindsley K; Alkharashi M; Hwang FS; Ng SM; Aldave AJ; Akpek EK
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Jan; 123(1):165-77. PubMed ID: 26545318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Donor Corneal Transplantation vs Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Patients with Previous Graft Failures: A Retrospective Single Center Study (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
    Akpek EK; Cassard SD; Dunlap K; Hahn S; Ramulu PY
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2015; 113():T3. PubMed ID: 26538773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis as the Primary Penetrating Corneal Procedure.
    Driver TH; Aravena C; Duong HNV; Christenbury JG; Yu F; Basak SK; Aldave AJ
    Cornea; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1400-1407. PubMed ID: 30157053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: an alternative to repeat penetrating keratoplasty.
    Ang M; Ho H; Wong C; Htoon HM; Mehta JS; Tan D
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1221-1227.e1. PubMed ID: 25152499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: survival, rejection risk, and visual outcome.
    Mitry D; Bhogal M; Patel AK; Lee BS; Chai SM; Price MO; Price FW; Jun AS; Aldave AJ; Mehta JS; Busin M; Allan BD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 132(6):742-9. PubMed ID: 24763830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glaucoma associated with Boston type I keratoprosthesis.
    Kamyar R; Weizer JS; de Paula FH; Stein JD; Moroi SE; John D; Musch DC; Mian SI
    Cornea; 2012 Feb; 31(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 22134402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boston type I keratoprosthesis versus penetrating keratoplasty following a single failed corneal graft.
    El-Khoury J; Khair D; Daoud R; Thompson P; Racine L; Harissi-Dagher M
    Eye (Lond); 2023 Feb; 37(3):486-491. PubMed ID: 35169272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endothelial keratoplasty versus repeat penetrating keratoplasty after failed penetrating keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang F; Zhang T; Kang YW; He JL; Li SM; Li SW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180468. PubMed ID: 28671976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Keratoprosthesis, Dohlman type I device for a patient with repeated corneal graft failure.
    Bajracharya L; Gurung R; Tabin G
    Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2012; 4(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 22344015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation for failed keratoplasty after keratolimbal allograft.
    Hou JH; de la Cruz J; Djalilian AR
    Cornea; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1432-5. PubMed ID: 22236785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1 as primary penetrating corneal procedure.
    Fadous R; Levallois-Gignac S; Vaillancourt L; Robert MC; Harissi-Dagher M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 99(12):1664-8. PubMed ID: 26034079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term Functional and Anatomic Outcomes of Repeat Graft After Optically Failed Therapeutic Keratoplasty.
    Srujana D; Kaur M; Urkude J; Rathi A; Sharma N; Titiyal JS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 189():166-175. PubMed ID: 29550189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the CHUM experience.
    Robert MC; Harissi-Dagher M
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 46(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 21708085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis for Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndromes.
    Phillips DL; Goins KM; Greiner MA; Alward WL; Kwon YH; Wagoner MD
    Cornea; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1383-6. PubMed ID: 26398156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of visual outcomes following Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation.
    Ahmad S; Akpek EK; Gehlbach PL; Dunlap K; Ramulu PY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 159(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 25555801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.
    Iverson SM; Spierer O; Papachristou GC; Feuer WJ; Shi W; Greenfield DS; O'Brien TP
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):223-231. PubMed ID: 28303370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glaucoma Risk Factors and Outcomes Following Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Surgery.
    Geoffrion D; Harissi-Dagher M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 226():56-67. PubMed ID: 33493469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 surgery: use of frozen versus fresh corneal donor carriers.
    Robert MC; Biernacki K; Harissi-Dagher M
    Cornea; 2012 Apr; 31(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 22269678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of Repeat Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation.
    Ahmad S; Mathews PM; Srikumaran D; Aldave AJ; Lenis T; Aquavella JV; Hannush SB; Belin M; Akpek EK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():181-7.e1. PubMed ID: 26482467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcomes of boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation: a retrospective multicenter cohort.
    Srikumaran D; Munoz B; Aldave AJ; Aquavella JV; Hannush SB; Schultze R; Belin M; Akpek EK
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Nov; 121(11):2159-64. PubMed ID: 25017414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.