139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26545585)
1. Cost-effectiveness of using the Cervex-Brush (broom) compared to the elongated spatula for collection of conventional cervical cytology samples within a high-burden HIV setting: a model-based analysis.
Schnippel K; Michelow P; Chibwesha CJ; Makura C; Lince-Deroche N; Goeieman B; Mulongo M; Jordaan S; Firnhaber C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Nov; 15():499. PubMed ID: 26545585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
Sparrow MJ; Fauck R; Gupta RK
N Z Med J; 1997 Sep; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.
Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC
WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
Neinstein LS; Church J; Akiyoshi T
J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling.
Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a cervical brush for Papanicolaou smear collection. A meta-analysis.
Bauman BJ
J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(5):267-75. PubMed ID: 8246082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Three Approaches for Cervical Cancer Screening among HIV-Positive Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lince-Deroche N; Phiri J; Michelow P; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141969. PubMed ID: 26569487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
Lo L; Jordan J
Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimens.
Dotters DJ; Carney CN; Droegemueller W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 3177528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adequacy of cervical cytology sampling with the Cervex brush and the Aylesbury spatula: a population based randomised controlled trial.
Dey P; Collins S; Desai M; Woodman C
BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7059):721-3. PubMed ID: 8819441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collection of the BD SurePath Pap Test with a broom device plus endocervical brush improves disease detection when compared to the broom device alone or the spatula plus endocervical brush combination.
Davis-Devine S; Day SJ; Anderson A; French A; Madison-Henness D; Mohar N; Tansy D; Hiremath A; Douglas JA; Freund GG
Cytojournal; 2008 Feb; 6():4. PubMed ID: 19495403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the efficacy of the cervex brush and the extended-tip wooden spatula with conventional cytology: a longitudinal study.
Whitaker CJ; Stamp EC; Young W; Greenwood LA
Cytojournal; 2009 Jan; 6():2. PubMed ID: 19495406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the yield of endocervical elements in a Pap smear with the use of the cytology brush.
Ruffin MT; Van Noord GR
Fam Med; 1991 Jul; 23(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 1884932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].
Regitnig P; Nader A; Wiener H
Pathologe; 2012 Jul; 33(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 22569927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
Martin-Hirsch P; Jarvis G; Kitchener H; Lilford R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (3):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10908482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
