BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26546850)

  • 1. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
    Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
    Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of US Birth Weight References and the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Standard.
    Kozuki N; Katz J; Christian P; Lee AC; Liu L; Silveira MF; Barros F; Tielsch JM; Schmiegelow C; Sania A; Roberfroid D; Ndyomugyenyi R; Mullany LC; Mongkolchati A; Huybregts L; Humphrey J; Fawzi W; Baqui AH; Adair L; Oddo VM; Black RE;
    JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Jul; 169(7):e151438. PubMed ID: 26147059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.
    Madden JV; Flatley CJ; Kumar S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):525.e1-525.e9. PubMed ID: 29462628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Fay E; Hugh O; Francis A; Katz R; Sitcov K; Souter V; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100545. PubMed ID: 34875415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery.
    Groom KM; Poppe KK; North RA; McCowan LM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):239.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity.
    McCowan LM; Harding JE; Stewart AW
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16045513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining small-for-gestational-age: prescriptive versus descriptive birthweight standards.
    Hoftiezer L; Hukkelhoven CW; Hogeveen M; Straatman HM; van Lingen RA
    Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Aug; 175(8):1047-57. PubMed ID: 27255904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
    Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Leavitt K; Tuuli M; Odibo AO
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
    Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Customized fetal growth standard compared with the INTERGROWTH-21st century standard at predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Odibo AO; Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Leavitt K; Obican S; Tuuli MG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Nov; 97(11):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 29878301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. INTERGROWTH-21st versus a customized method for the prediction of neonatal nutritional status in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
    Fernández-Alba JJ; Castillo Lara M; Sánchez Mera R; Aragón Baizán S; González Macías C; Quintero Prado R; Vilar Sánchez A; Jimenez Heras JM; Moreno Corral LJ; Figueras F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Feb; 22(1):136. PubMed ID: 35183148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the ability of alternative birthweight and fetal weight standards to identify preterm newborns at increased risk of perinatal death.
    Ferdynus C; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Burguet A; Sagot P; Gouyon JB
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1456-64. PubMed ID: 23721356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index.
    Gardosi J; Hugh O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):547.e1-547.e13. PubMed ID: 37247647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of customized and population-based birth-weight standards: the influence of gestational age.
    Hemming K; Hutton JL; Bonellie S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Sep; 146(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19581044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 60.