1206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26546850)
1. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of US Birth Weight References and the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Standard.
Kozuki N; Katz J; Christian P; Lee AC; Liu L; Silveira MF; Barros F; Tielsch JM; Schmiegelow C; Sania A; Roberfroid D; Ndyomugyenyi R; Mullany LC; Mongkolchati A; Huybregts L; Humphrey J; Fawzi W; Baqui AH; Adair L; Oddo VM; Black RE;
JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Jul; 169(7):e151438. PubMed ID: 26147059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.
Madden JV; Flatley CJ; Kumar S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):525.e1-525.e9. PubMed ID: 29462628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21
Fay E; Hugh O; Francis A; Katz R; Sitcov K; Souter V; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100545. PubMed ID: 34875415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Small-for-gestational-age infants classified by customized or population birthweight centiles: impact of gestational age at delivery.
Groom KM; Poppe KK; North RA; McCowan LM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):239.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17826403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity.
McCowan LM; Harding JE; Stewart AW
BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16045513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining small-for-gestational-age: prescriptive versus descriptive birthweight standards.
Hoftiezer L; Hukkelhoven CW; Hogeveen M; Straatman HM; van Lingen RA
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Aug; 175(8):1047-57. PubMed ID: 27255904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Leavitt K; Tuuli M; Odibo AO
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Customized fetal growth standard compared with the INTERGROWTH-21st century standard at predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates.
Odibo AO; Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Leavitt K; Obican S; Tuuli MG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Nov; 97(11):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 29878301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. INTERGROWTH-21st versus a customized method for the prediction of neonatal nutritional status in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Fernández-Alba JJ; Castillo Lara M; Sánchez Mera R; Aragón Baizán S; González Macías C; Quintero Prado R; Vilar Sánchez A; Jimenez Heras JM; Moreno Corral LJ; Figueras F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Feb; 22(1):136. PubMed ID: 35183148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the ability of alternative birthweight and fetal weight standards to identify preterm newborns at increased risk of perinatal death.
Ferdynus C; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Burguet A; Sagot P; Gouyon JB
BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1456-64. PubMed ID: 23721356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index.
Gardosi J; Hugh O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):547.e1-547.e13. PubMed ID: 37247647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of customized and population-based birth-weight standards: the influence of gestational age.
Hemming K; Hutton JL; Bonellie S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Sep; 146(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19581044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
Sovio U; Smith GCS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
