These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26548878)
1. Effect of implant number and distribution on load transfer in implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses for the anterior maxilla: A photoelastic stress analysis study. Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim YL; Cho HW J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 26548878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Number and localization of the implants for the fixed prosthetic reconstructions: on the strain in the anterior maxillary region. Bölükbaşı N; Yeniyol S Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):431-45. PubMed ID: 25765190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region. Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants. Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla. Corrêa CB; Margonar R; Noritomi PY; Vaz LG J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 24355510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads]. Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical Study of Optimal Implant Position for Maxillary Implant-Supported Overdentures Using Three-Dimensional Simulation Software. Kamei K; Gonda T; Takahashi T; Maeda Y Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(6):619–626. PubMed ID: 30192350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data. Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Anterior Implant Position on Biomechanical Performance in the Maxillary All-on-Four Treatment: A 3-D Finite Element Analysis. Sezer T; Kilic K; Esim E J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):177-186. PubMed ID: 34091679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic stress analysis of load transfer to implants and natural teeth comparing rigid and semirigid connectors. Nishimura RD; Ochiai KT; Caputo AA; Jeong CM J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 10347358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach. Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Keleş HG; Karaca Ç Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla. de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants. Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla. Bergkvist G Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (196):10-75. PubMed ID: 18637314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effects of different fixed partial denture designs planned on bicortically anchored short, graft-supported long, or 45-degree-inclined long implants in the posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Seker E; Ulusoy M; Ozan O; Doğan DÖ; Seker BK Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):e1-9. PubMed ID: 24451875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A photoelastic stress analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses with marginal gaps. Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim NY; Kim YL; Cho HW Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):735-49. PubMed ID: 23927066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]