These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26550679)

  • 1. Predicting probation revocation and residential facility placement at juvenile probation review hearings: Youth-specific and hearing-specific factors.
    NeMoyer A; Brooks Holliday S; Goldstein NE; McKitten RL
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 26550679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of juveniles' noncompliance with probation requirements.
    NeMoyer A; Goldstein NE; McKitten RL; Prelic A; Ebbecke J; Foster E; Burkard C
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):580-91. PubMed ID: 24933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating probation strategies with juvenile offenders: the influence of officers' attitudes and youth characteristics.
    Schwalbe CS; Maschi T
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):357-67. PubMed ID: 18839292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bringing hope and change: a study of youth probation officers in Toronto.
    Umamaheswar J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Sep; 57(9):1158-82. PubMed ID: 22573709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping Juvenile Justice: Identifying Existing Structural Barriers to Accessing Probation Services.
    Fountain EN; Mahmoudi D
    Am J Community Psychol; 2021 Mar; 67(1-2):116-129. PubMed ID: 33249603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.
    Childs KK; Ryals J; Frick PJ; Lawing K; Phillippi SW; Deprato DK
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 23606362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of community-based provider reports on juvenile probation officers' recommendations: Effects of positive and negative framing on decision making.
    Gale-Bentz E; Goldstein NES; Cole LM; Durham K
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 30702306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probation officers' perceptions of youths' risk of reoffending and use of risk assessment in case management.
    Perrault RT; Paiva-Salisbury M; Vincent GM
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(4):487-505. PubMed ID: 22740174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Youth's Perceptions of Parental Support and Parental Knowledge as Moderators of the Association Between Youth-Probation Officer Relationship and Probation Non-compliance.
    Vidal S; Woolard J
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Jul; 46(7):1452-1471. PubMed ID: 26487593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What's risk got to do with it: Judges' and probation officers' understanding and use of juvenile risk assessments in making residential placement decisions.
    McPhee J; Heilbrun K; Cubbon DN; Soler M; Goldstein NE
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 37053385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partners or adversaries? The relation between juvenile diversion supervision and parenting practices.
    Fine AD; Rowan ZR; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):461-473. PubMed ID: 33444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A national survey of U.S. juvenile mental health courts.
    Callahan L; Cocozza J; Steadman HJ; Tillman S
    Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Feb; 63(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 22302329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Juvenile probation officers' perceptions on youth substance use varies from task-shifting to family-based contingency management.
    Rudes DS; Viglione J; Sheidow AJ; McCart MR; Chapman JE; Taxman FS
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2021 Jan; 120():108144. PubMed ID: 33298307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative Impact of the Job: Secondary Trauma Among Juvenile Detention and Juvenile Probation Officers.
    Rhineberger-Dunn G; Mack KY
    Violence Vict; 2020 Feb; 35(1):68-87. PubMed ID: 32015070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The school-police partnership. Identifying at-risk youth through a truant recovery program.
    White MD; Fyfe JJ; Campbell SP; Goldkamp JS
    Eval Rev; 2001 Oct; 25(5):507-32. PubMed ID: 11575027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Juvenile probation officers' mental health decision making.
    Wasserman GA; McReynolds LS; Whited AL; Keating JM; Musabegovic H; Huo Y
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2008 Sep; 35(5):410-22. PubMed ID: 18642071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Juvenile participation in conversations with probation officers.
    van Nijnatten C; Stevens G
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 May; 56(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 21429957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The point of diminishing returns in juvenile probation: Probation requirements and risk of technical probation violations among first-time probation-involved youth.
    Dir AL; Magee LA; Clifton RL; Ouyang F; Tu W; Wiehe SE; Aalsma MC
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2021 May; 72(2):283-291. PubMed ID: 34588760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Sequential Intercept Model and Juvenile Justice: Review and Prospectus.
    Heilbrun K; Goldstein NES; DeMatteo D; Newsham R; Gale-Bentz E; Cole L; Arnold S
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jul; 35(4):319-336. PubMed ID: 28612513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The school-to-prison pipeline for probation youth with special education needs.
    Kim BE; Johnson J; Rhinehart L; Logan-Greene P; Lomeli J; Nurius PS
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2021; 91(3):375-385. PubMed ID: 34138628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.