These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2655086)

  • 1. The Dingell probe finally goes public.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4905):643, 645-6. PubMed ID: 2655086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dingell v. Baltimore.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Apr; 244(4903):412-4. PubMed ID: 2655079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dingell encounters feather wall.
    Nature; 1989 May; 339(6221):161. PubMed ID: 2654646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whose notes are they?
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4906):765. PubMed ID: 2658051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Baltimore dispute.
    Sibbison JB
    Lancet; 1989 May; 1(8647):1148-9. PubMed ID: 2566100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fraud squad.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):155-6. PubMed ID: 1967443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whistle-blowers air cases at house hearings.
    Holden C
    Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4851):386-7. PubMed ID: 3358123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Article brings censure recommendation.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1987 Sep; 258(9):1137. PubMed ID: 3306007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH panel finds no fraud in Cell paper but cites errors.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4885):1499. PubMed ID: 3201234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New rules on misconduct.
    Holden C
    Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):593. PubMed ID: 2762812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrity of research papers questioned.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1987 Jan; 235(4787):422-3. PubMed ID: 3798118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduce fraud in seven easy steps.
    Norman C
    Science; 1984 May; 224(4649):581. PubMed ID: 6710157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Office of scientific integrity.
    Mason JO
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):903-4. PubMed ID: 2543069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Harvard fraud case: where does the problem lie?
    Knox R
    JAMA; 1983 Apr; 249(14):1797-99, 1802-7. PubMed ID: 6339751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bill would set fraud guidelines for scientific publications.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1988 Oct; 242(4876):187. PubMed ID: 3175646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The case of the altered notebooks: Part IV.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):809. PubMed ID: 2188358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More grist for Dingell's mill.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6232):334. PubMed ID: 2666858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.