275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26551184)
1. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Miller NR; Cypher RL; Foglia LM; Pates JA; Nielsen PE
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 26551184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix.
Osmundson SS; Ou-Yang RJ; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):601-605. PubMed ID: 20733441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.
Osmundson S; Ou-Yang RJ; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):583-587. PubMed ID: 21343761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation.
Silver RM; Rice MM; Grobman WA; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Wapner RJ; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Thorp JM; Chauhan SP; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 32925634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
Grobman WA; Rice MM; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Perez-Delboy A; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Boggess KA; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
N Engl J Med; 2018 Aug; 379(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 30089070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
Sgayer I; Frank Wolf M
Harefuah; 2019 Dec; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]