These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26551372)
1. Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients. Mittal M; Kumar A; Srivastava D; Sharma P; Sharma S J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 26551372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors. Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control syringe and a conventional injection technique during pediatric dental procedures. Langthasa M; Yeluri R; Jain AA; Munshi AK J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 23514685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe. Ram D; Peretz B J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pain sensation and injection techniques in maxillary dento-alveolar surgery procedures in children--a comparison between conventional and computerized injection techniques (The Wand). Jälevik B; Klingberg G Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 25102717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of various modes of computerized delivery of local anesthesia in primary maxillary molars. Ashkenazi M; Blumer S; Eli I Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16615373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 2-Stage Injection Technique in Children. Sandeep V; Kumar M; Jyostna P; Duggi V Anesth Prog; 2016; 63(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 26866405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of children's pain reactions and perceptions to AMSA injection using CCLAD versus traditional injections. Feda M; Al Amoudi N; Sharaf A; Hanno A; Farsi N; Masoud I; Almushyt A J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 20578658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the anesthetic effectiveness of anterior and middle superior alveolar injection using a computerized device versus traditional technique in children. Al Amoudi N; Feda M; Sharaf A; Hanno A; Farsi N J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 33(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19358373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children. Allen KD; Kotil D; Larzelere RE; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12212873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia. Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection. Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Lamberton JA; Oesterle LJ; Shellhart WC; Newman SM; Harrell RE; Tilliss T; Singh N; Carey CM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26718373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Majid OW; Ahmed AM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is palatal injection mandatory prior to extraction of permanent maxillary tooth: a preliminary study. Sekhar GR; Nagaraju T; ; Nandagopal V; Sudheer R; Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 21525686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand). Ran D; Peretz B J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12739685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective pain response to two anesthetic systems in dental surgery: traditional syringe vs. a computer controlled delivery system. Patini R; Coviello V; Raffaelli L; Manicone PF; Dehkhargani SZ; Verdugo F; Perfetti G; D'Addona A J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2012; 26(2 Suppl):89-97. PubMed ID: 23164333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children. Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transpapillary versus palatal injection technique for maxillary tooth extractions. Janjua OS; Luqman U; Ibrahim MW; Shah I J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Mar; 22(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 22414352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible? Uckan S; Dayangac E; Araz K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]