164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26551732)
1. Robotic-assisted flexible colonoscopy: preliminary safety and efficiency in humans.
Rozeboom ED; Bastiaansen BA; de Vries ES; Dekker E; Fockens PA; Broeders IA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 26551732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of joystick guided colonoscopy.
Rozeboom ED; Broeders IA; Fockens P
J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 26531196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy.
van der Stap N; Rozeboom ED; Pullens HJ; van der Heijden F; Broeders IA
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Mar; 11(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26450108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical impact of endoscopy position detecting unit (UPD-3) for a non-sedated colonoscopy.
Fukuzawa M; Uematsu J; Kono S; Suzuki S; Sato T; Yagi N; Tsuji Y; Yagi K; Kusano C; Gotoda T; Kawai T; Moriyasu F
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(16):4903-10. PubMed ID: 25945003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy.
Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Siersema PD; Carr-Locke DL; Halpern Z; Santo E; Domanov S
Endoscopy; 2013 Sep; 45(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 23939509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients.
Moreels TG; Macken EJ; Roth B; Van Outryve MJ; Pelckmans PA
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jan; 25(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 19686405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motorized spiral colonoscopy: a first single-center feasibility trial.
Beyna T; Schneider M; Pullmann D; Gerges C; Kandler J; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):518-523. PubMed ID: 29253918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study.
Groth S; Rex DK; Rösch T; Hoepffner N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jun; 106(6):1075-80. PubMed ID: 21386833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy.
Coppola F; Gaia S; Cosimato M; Recchia S
Dig Liver Dis; 2011 Jun; 43(6):475-7. PubMed ID: 21334994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study.
Trecca A; Catalano F; Bella A; Borghini R
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1442-1450. PubMed ID: 31932942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy.
Valdastri P; Ciuti G; Verbeni A; Menciassi A; Dario P; Arezzo A; Morino M
Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1238-46. PubMed ID: 22179445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel self-propelled disposable colonoscope is effective for colonoscopy in humans (with video).
Gluck N; Melhem A; Halpern Z; Mergener K; Santo E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):998-1004.e1. PubMed ID: 26391735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental assessment of a novel robotically-driven endoscopic capsule compared to traditional colonoscopy.
Arezzo A; Menciassi A; Valdastri P; Ciuti G; Lucarini G; Salerno M; Di Natali C; Verra M; Dario P; Morino M
Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Aug; 45(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 23453360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy.
Rex DK; Chen SC; Overhiser AJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jul; 5(7):879-83. PubMed ID: 17544873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ludolph T; Huppertz-Hauss G; Paulsen J; Seip B; Sauar J; Kjellevold Ø; Chengarov L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 20923378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of robotic colonoscopy in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy.
Tumino E; Parisi G; Bertoni M; Bertini M; Metrangolo S; Ierardi E; Cervelli R; Bresci G; Sacco R
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Feb; 21(4):819-826. PubMed ID: 28272700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers.
Rösch T; Adler A; Pohl H; Wettschureck E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Hoepffner N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18355823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic interventions using the short double-balloon endoscope in patients after incomplete colonoscopy.
Hotta K; Katsuki S; Ohata K; Abe T; Endo M; Shimatani M; Nagaya T; Kusaka T; Matsuda T; Uraoka T; Yamaguchi Y; Murakami Y; Saito Y
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 24889819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
