184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26552379)
1. Beyond body mass: how prey traits improve predictions of functional response parameters.
Kalinoski RM; DeLong JP
Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):543-50. PubMed ID: 26552379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
Klecka J; Boukal DS
J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What drives interaction strengths in complex food webs? A test with feeding rates of a generalist stream predator.
Preston DL; Henderson JS; Falke LP; Segui LM; Layden TJ; Novak M
Ecology; 2018 Jul; 99(7):1591-1601. PubMed ID: 29738085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body size, body size ratio, and prey type influence the functional response of damselfly nymphs.
Uiterwaal SF; Mares C; DeLong JP
Oecologia; 2017 Nov; 185(3):339-346. PubMed ID: 28936547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Food-web interaction strength distributions are conserved by greater variation between than within predator-prey pairs.
Preston DL; Falke LP; Henderson JS; Novak M
Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02816. PubMed ID: 31287561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inducible defenses in prey intensify predator cannibalism.
Kishida O; Trussell GC; Nishimura K; Ohgushi T
Ecology; 2009 Nov; 90(11):3150-8. PubMed ID: 19967870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carnivorous planktonic Difflugia (Protista, Amoebina Testacea) and their predators.
Han BP; Wang T; Xu L; Lin QQ; Jinyu Z; Dumont HJ
Eur J Protistol; 2011 Aug; 47(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 21632222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life-history traits buffer against heat wave effects on predator-prey dynamics in zooplankton.
Zhang H; Urrutia-Cordero P; He L; Geng H; Chaguaceda F; Xu J; Hansson LA
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Oct; 24(10):4747-4757. PubMed ID: 29963731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seasonal shifts in predator body size diversity and trophic interactions in size-structured predator-prey systems.
Rudolf VH
J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 22191419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body masses, functional responses and predator-prey stability.
Kalinkat G; Schneider FD; Digel C; Guill C; Rall BC; Brose U
Ecol Lett; 2013 Sep; 16(9):1126-34. PubMed ID: 23819684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allometric scaling of indirect effects: body size ratios predict non-consumptive effects in multi-predator systems.
Krenek L; Rudolf VH
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Nov; 83(6):1461-8. PubMed ID: 24910170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predator-prey interactions in a changing world: humic stress disrupts predator threat evasion in copepods.
Santonja M; Minguez L; Gessner MO; Sperfeld E
Oecologia; 2017 Mar; 183(3):887-898. PubMed ID: 28035473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing changes in arthropod predator-prey interactions through DNA-based gut content analysis-variable environment, stable diet.
Eitzinger B; Abrego N; Gravel D; Huotari T; Vesterinen EJ; Roslin T
Mol Ecol; 2019 Jan; 28(2):266-280. PubMed ID: 30230073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prey Limitation Drives Variation in Allometric Scaling of Predator-Prey Interactions.
Costa-Pereira R; Araújo MS; Olivier RDS; Souza FL; Rudolf VHW
Am Nat; 2018 Oct; 192(4):E139-E149. PubMed ID: 30205026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predator-prey interactions of terrestrial invertebrates are determined by predator body size and species identity.
Miller-Ter Kuile A; Apigo A; Bui A; DiFiore B; Forbes ES; Lee M; Orr D; Preston DL; Behm R; Bogar T; Childress J; Dirzo R; Klope M; Lafferty KD; McLaughlin J; Morse M; Motta C; Park K; Plummer K; Weber D; Young R; Young H
Ecology; 2022 May; 103(5):e3634. PubMed ID: 35060625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predator identity and the nature and strength of food web interactions.
Henry LM; Bannerman JA; Gillespie DR; Roitberg BD
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Nov; 79(6):1164-71. PubMed ID: 20646124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predator diversity and environmental change modify the strengths of trophic and nontrophic interactions.
Sentis A; Gémard C; Jaugeon B; Boukal DS
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jul; 23(7):2629-2640. PubMed ID: 27862723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity can lead to stable predator-prey interaction.
Mougi A; Kishida O
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1172-81. PubMed ID: 19622080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Go big or … don't? A field-based diet evaluation of freshwater piscivore and prey fish size relationships.
Gaeta JW; Ahrenstorff TD; Diana JS; Fetzer WW; Jones TS; Lawson ZJ; McInerny MC; Santucci VJ; Vander Zanden MJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194092. PubMed ID: 29543856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
