BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26552654)

  • 1. Agreement of spatio-temporal gait parameters between a vertical ground reaction force decomposition algorithm and a motion capture system.
    Veilleux LN; Raison M; Rauch F; Robert M; Ballaz L
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():257-64. PubMed ID: 26552654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysing gait using a force-measuring walkway: intrasession repeatability in healthy children and adolescents.
    Veilleux LN; Ballaz L; Robert M; Lemay M; Rauch F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(13):1447-51. PubMed ID: 23360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters determined by a new instrumented treadmill system.
    Reed LF; Urry SR; Wearing SC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Aug; 14():249. PubMed ID: 23964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference values of spatiotemporal parameters, joint angles, ground reaction forces, and plantar pressure distribution during normal gait in young women.
    Fryzowicz A; Murawa M; Kabaciński J; Rzepnicka A; Dworak LB
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 29658524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of spatiotemporal, plantar pressure and force parameters during treadmill walking and running.
    Nüesch C; Overberg JA; Schwameder H; Pagenstert G; Mündermann A
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():117-123. PubMed ID: 29547791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the vertical ground reaction forces acting upon individual limbs during healthy and clinical gait.
    Meurisse GM; Dierick F; Schepens B; Bastien GJ
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():245-50. PubMed ID: 26549482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gait analysis on force treadmill in children: comparison with results from ground-based force platforms.
    Tesio L; Malloggi C; Portinaro NM; Catino L; Lovecchio N; Rota V
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2017 Dec; 40(4):315-324. PubMed ID: 28719477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and minimum detectable change of measures of gait in children during walking and running on an instrumented treadmill.
    McSweeney SC; Reed LF; Wearing SC
    Gait Posture; 2020 Jan; 75():105-108. PubMed ID: 31648119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system.
    Kanko RM; Laende EK; Strutzenberger G; Brown M; Selbie WS; DePaul V; Scott SH; Deluzio KJ
    J Biomech; 2021 Jun; 122():110414. PubMed ID: 33915475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gait analysis using a force-measuring gangway: intrasession repeatability in healthy adults.
    Veilleux LN; Robert M; Ballaz L; Lemay M; Rauch F
    J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2011 Mar; 11(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21364272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect for measuring gait parameters during treadmill walking.
    Xu X; McGorry RW; Chou LS; Lin JH; Chang CC
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jul; 42(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 26002604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a commercial inertial sensor system for spatiotemporal gait measurements in children.
    Lanovaz JL; Oates AR; Treen TT; Unger J; Musselman KE
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():14-19. PubMed ID: 27693956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A robust machine learning enabled decomposition of shear ground reaction forces during the double contact phase of walking.
    Bastien GJ; Gosseye TP; Penta M
    Gait Posture; 2019 Sep; 73():221-227. PubMed ID: 31374439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of forward-directed aiding force on gait mechanics in healthy young adults while walking faster.
    Dionisio VC; Hurt CP; Brown DA
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():12-17. PubMed ID: 29803081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The generation of centripetal force when walking in a circle: insight from the distribution of ground reaction forces recorded by plantar insoles.
    Turcato AM; Godi M; Giordano A; Schieppati M; Nardone A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jan; 12(1):4. PubMed ID: 25576354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical ground reaction forces in patients after calcaneal trauma surgery.
    van Hoeve S; Verbruggen J; Willems P; Meijer K; Poeze M
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():523-526. PubMed ID: 28961549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of spatio-temporal and dynamic parameters in various, daily occurring, turning conditions.
    Krafft FC; Eckelt M; Köllner A; Wehrstein M; Stein T; Potthast W
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jan; 41(1):307-12. PubMed ID: 25282259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematic Validation of a Multi-Kinect v2 Instrumented 10-Meter Walkway for Quantitative Gait Assessments.
    Geerse DJ; Coolen BH; Roerdink M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139913. PubMed ID: 26461498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between margin of stability and deviations in spatiotemporal gait features in healthy young adults.
    Sivakumaran S; Schinkel-Ivy A; Masani K; Mansfield A
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():366-373. PubMed ID: 28987772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flat foot functional evaluation using pattern recognition of ground reaction data.
    Bertani A; Cappello A; Benedetti MG; Simoncini L; Catani F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1999 Aug; 14(7):484-93. PubMed ID: 10521632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.