These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Fortune B; Hood DC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1364-75. PubMed ID: 12601070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective perimetry using a four-channel multifocal VEP system: correlation with conventional perimetry and thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer. Horn FK; Kaltwasser C; Jünemann AG; Kremers J; Tornow RP Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 96(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 22116959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Hood DC; Greenstein VC Prog Retin Eye Res; 2003 Mar; 22(2):201-51. PubMed ID: 12604058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective visual field determination in forensic ophthalmology with an optimized 4-channel multifocal VEP perimetry system: a case report of a patient with retinitis pigmentosa. Kaltwasser C; Horn FK; Kremers J; Juenemann A; Bergua A Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 123(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 21842405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Hood DC; Zhang X; Hong JE; Chen CS Doc Ophthalmol; 2002 May; 104(3):303-20. PubMed ID: 12076018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of Pattern-pulse and Pattern-reversal Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials in Normal Individuals]. Zhu RT; Liu XB; Xu XM; Zheng CF Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 32(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 27295855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of normal multifocal VEP: implications for detecting progression. Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Johnson CA J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 16633227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous EEG/fMRI analysis of the resonance phenomena in steady-state visual evoked responses. Bayram A; Bayraktaroglu Z; Karahan E; Erdogan B; Bilgic B; Ozker M; Kasikci I; Duru AD; Ademoglu A; Oztürk C; Arikan K; Tarhan N; Demiralp T Clin EEG Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 21675599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gaussian wavelet transform and classifier to reliably estimate latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP). Thie J; Sriram P; Klistorner A; Graham SL Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 22100835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials. James AC; Ruseckaite R; Maddess T Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15842740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation. Souza GS; Schakelford HB; Moura AL; Gomes BD; Ventura DF; Fitzgerald ME; Silveira LC Braz J Med Biol Res; 2012 Oct; 45(10):955-61. PubMed ID: 22782556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]