These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26553615)

  • 1. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
    Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Dooms KT; Chassaing DL
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2011; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 21703099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices.
    Yoon IK; Martin BL; Carr WW; ;
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2006; 27(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 17176781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of allergy skin testing.
    Shtessel M; Tversky J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2018 Jan; 120(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 29273134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two disposable plastic skin test devices with the bifurcated needle for epicutaneous allergy testing.
    Corder WT; Hogan MB; Wilson NW
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Sep; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 8814048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and Skintestor Omni allergy skin test devices.
    Dykewicz MS; Lemmon JK; Keaney DL
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2007 Jun; 98(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17601269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
    Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing.
    Carr WW; Martin B; Howard RS; Cox L; Borish L;
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Aug; 116(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 16108145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot study of the validation of percutaneous testing in cats.
    Rossi MA; Messinger L; Olivry T; Hoontrakoon R
    Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):488-e115. PubMed ID: 23826630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Histamine Control Concentration Leads to False Negative Allergy Skin Testing.
    Amirneni A; Tversky J
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2021 Nov; 35(6):854-860. PubMed ID: 33827292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pain perception and performance of three devices for single-site allergen skin testing.
    Nelson HS; Lopez P; Curran-Everett D
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2014; 35(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 24433598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal skin prick wheal size for diagnosis of cat allergy.
    Zarei M; Remer CF; Kaplan MS; Staveren AM; Lin CK; Razo E; Goldberg B
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2004 Jun; 92(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 15237761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of devices for skin prick testing.
    Nelson HS; Lahr J; Buchmeier A; McCormick D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1998 Feb; 101(2 Pt 1):153-6. PubMed ID: 9500746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests.
    Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
    Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allergen skin prick test should be adjusted by the histamine reactivity.
    Dreborg S
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25765942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
    Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of the skin prick test.
    Vohlonen I; Terho EO; Koivikko A; Vanto T; Holmén A; Heinonen OP
    Allergy; 1989 Nov; 44(8):525-31. PubMed ID: 2610328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of topical vapocoolant spray on skin test wheal, flare, and pain responses.
    Waibel KH; Katial RK
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Aug; 95(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 16136764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of methods for the estimation of threshold concentrations by the skin prick test.
    Dreborg S; Holgersson M
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 25765858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.