138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26553958)
1. Resource implications of risk-reducing mastectomy and reconstruction.
Robertson SA; Summerhayes CM; Laws S; Rainsbury RM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 26553958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resource implications of bilateral autologous breast reconstruction--a single centre's seven year experience.
Molina AR; Ponniah A; Simcock J; Irwin MS; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1588-91. PubMed ID: 19913470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes and Cost Analysis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction and Gynecologic Procedures.
Del Corral GA; Wes AM; Fischer JP; Serletti JM; Wu LC
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):534-8. PubMed ID: 24691318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of immediate one-stage and tissue-expander breast reconstructions after mastectomy in commercially insured patients.
Singh NK; Reaven NL; Funk SE
Manag Care; 2013 Mar; 22(3):36-43. PubMed ID: 23610805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurately costing unilateral delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Paget JT; Young KC; Wilson SM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jul; 66(7):926-30. PubMed ID: 23664800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin-reducing mastectomy and one-stage implant reconstruction with a myodermal flap: a safe and effective technique in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomy.
Irwin GW; Black A; Refsum SE; McIntosh SA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23664385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: a 15-year experience.
Pacella SJ; Vogel JE; Locke MB; Codner MA
Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 21317117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Knight MA; Nguyen DT; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jun; 56(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 16721068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-expansion before risk reducing mastectomy combined with lipomodelling to enhance results from implant based reconstruction.
Katerinaki E; Sircar T; Fatah F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Feb; 65(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 21925988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of complications in outpatient mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.
Simpson SA; Ying BL; Ross LA; Friedman DJ; Quraishi MI; Rizvi AA; Bernik SF
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Sep; 205(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 17765163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical and financial implications of genetic counseling and requests for concurrent prophylactic mastectomy.
Murphy RX; Adkinson JM; Namey T; Eid S; Bleznak A
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 20395792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost minimisation analysis of using acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™) for breast reconstruction compared with standard techniques.
Johnson RK; Wright CK; Gandhi A; Charny MC; Barr L
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 39(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 23266307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer.
Asban A; Homsy C; Chen L; Fisher C; Losken A; Chatterjee A
Breast; 2018 Oct; 41():159-164. PubMed ID: 30099327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medium-term cost analysis of breast reconstructions in a single Dutch centre: a comparison of implants, implants preceded by tissue expansion, LD transpositions and DIEP flaps.
Damen TH; Wei W; Mureau MA; Tjong-Joe-Wai R; Hofer SO; Essink-Bot ML; Hovius SE; Polinder S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Aug; 64(8):1043-53. PubMed ID: 21317054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the cost of delayed and immediate autologous breast reconstruction in Belgium.
Neyt MJ; Blondeel PN; Morrison CM; Albrecht JA
Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Jun; 58(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 15897033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Longitudinal Assessment of Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Comparing Implant- and Autologous-based Breast Reconstruction.
Fischer JP; Fox JP; Nelson JA; Kovach SJ; Serletti JM
Ann Surg; 2015 Oct; 262(4):692-9. PubMed ID: 26366550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mastectomy with immediate reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Comments on indications and technique. A series of 112 cases].
Dauplat J; Le Bouedec G; Janny-Peyronie M; Vergote T; Kauffmann P; Feillel V
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 8901297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Funding analysis of bilateral autologous free-flap breast reconstructions in Australia.
Sinha S; Ruskin O; McCombe D; Morrison W; Webb A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Aug; 68(8):1120-6. PubMed ID: 26159470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.
Kummerow KL; Du L; Penson DF; Shyr Y; Hooks MA
JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 25408966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
