These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

716 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26554491)

  • 1. Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):872-84. PubMed ID: 26554491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):599-612. PubMed ID: 33157559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing?
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):697-711. PubMed ID: 23072962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guided ecological momentary assessment in real and virtual sound environments.
    Mansour N; Westermann A; Marschall M; May T; Dau T; Buchholz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2695. PubMed ID: 34717468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Forced Social Isolation on the Auditory Ecology and Psychosocial Functions of Listeners With Cochlear Implants During COVID-19 Mitigation Efforts.
    Dunn CC; Stangl E; Oleson J; Smith M; Chipara O; Wu YH
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 33369590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of ecological momentary assessment in hearing research and future clinical applications.
    Timmer BHB; Hickson L; Launer S
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():24-28. PubMed ID: 29933937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Field Evaluation of Subjective Ratings of Speech in Noise.
    Jenstad LM; Singh G; Boretzki M; DeLongis A; Fichtl E; Ho R; Huen M; Meyer V; Pang F; Stephenson E
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1770-1781. PubMed ID: 34010249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting Individual Hearing-Aid Preference From Self-Reported Listening Experiences in Daily Life.
    Christensen JH; Rumley J; Gil-Carvajal JC; Whiston H; Lough M; Saunders GH
    Ear Hear; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 45(5):1313-1325. PubMed ID: 38783420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of ecological momentary assessment to evaluate real-world aided outcomes with children.
    Glista D; O'Hagan R; Van Eeckhoutte M; Lai Y; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Apr; 60(sup1):S68-S78. PubMed ID: 33761827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
    Glyde H; Cameron S; Dillon H; Hickson L; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 22941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Kokx-Ryan M; Cohen J; Cord MT; Walden TC; Makashay MJ; Sheffield BM; Brungart DS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):838-55. PubMed ID: 26554489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Laboratory Evaluation of Contextual Factors Affecting Ratings of Speech in Noise: Implications for Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Jenstad LM; Gillen L; Singh G; DeLongis A; Pang F
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):823-832. PubMed ID: 30557223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Timmer BHB; Hickson L; Launer S
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518783608. PubMed ID: 29956590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.