BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26554717)

  • 1. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).
    Coll C; Notter D; Gottschalk F; Sun T; Som C; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 26554717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions.
    Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9216-22. PubMed ID: 20000512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: a risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling.
    Gottschalk F; Kost E; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 23418073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Gottschalk F; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Feb; 185():69-76. PubMed ID: 24220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis.
    Gottschalk F; Sonderer T; Scholz RW; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 May; 29(5):1036-48. PubMed ID: 20821538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies.
    Gottschalk F; Sun T; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2013 Oct; 181():287-300. PubMed ID: 23856352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings.
    Som C; Wick P; Krug H; Nowack B
    Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 21397331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Form-Specific and Probabilistic Environmental Risk Assessment of 3 Engineered Nanomaterials (Nano-Ag, Nano-TiO
    Hong H; Adam V; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Sep; 40(9):2629-2639. PubMed ID: 34171135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic modeling of the flows and environmental risks of nano-silica.
    Wang Y; Kalinina A; Sun T; Nowack B
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 545-546():67-76. PubMed ID: 26745294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Material-specific properties applied to an environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials - implications on grouping and read-across concepts.
    Wigger H; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2019 Jun; 13(5):623-643. PubMed ID: 30727799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considering the forms of released engineered nanomaterials in probabilistic material flow analysis.
    Adam V; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Dec; 243(Pt A):17-27. PubMed ID: 30170204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of species sensitivity distribution modeling approaches for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials - A case study for silver and titanium dioxide representative materials.
    Sørensen SN; Wigger H; Zabeo A; Semenzin E; Hristozov D; Nowack B; Spurgeon DJ; Baun A
    Aquat Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 225():105543. PubMed ID: 32585540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
    Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling of Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Bornhöft NA; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(9):4701-11. PubMed ID: 27043743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hazard assessments of manufactured nanomaterials.
    Morimoto Y; Kobayashi N; Shinohara N; Myojo T; Tanaka I; Nakanishi J
    J Occup Health; 2010; 52(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 20972355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental risk assessment of engineered nano-SiO
    Wang Y; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 May; 37(5):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29315795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are engineered nano iron oxide particles safe? an environmental risk assessment by probabilistic exposure, effects and risk modeling.
    Wang Y; Deng L; Caballero-Guzman A; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2016 Dec; 10(10):1545-1554. PubMed ID: 27781563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Envisioning Nano Release Dynamics in a Changing World: Using Dynamic Probabilistic Modeling to Assess Future Environmental Emissions of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Mitrano DM; Bornhöft NA; Scheringer M; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(5):2854-2863. PubMed ID: 28157288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health--lessons learned from four case studies.
    Aschberger K; Micheletti C; Sokull-Klüttgen B; Christensen FM
    Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1143-56. PubMed ID: 21397332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: a case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City.
    Musee N
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1181-95. PubMed ID: 21148195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.