These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26554843)
21. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict. Meier ME; Kane MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Asymmetric coupling of action and outcome valence in active and observational feedback learning. Peterburs J; Frieling A; Bellebaum C Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1553-1566. PubMed ID: 32322967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Self-reported impulsivity in Huntington's disease patients and relationship to executive dysfunction and reward responsiveness. Johnson PL; Potts GF; Sanchez-Ramos J; Cimino CR J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 39(7):694-706. PubMed ID: 27892808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity. Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks. Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors. Verghese A; Mattingley JB; Palmer PE; Dux PE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):193-210. PubMed ID: 29043656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task. Jones S; Paul ES; Dayan P; Robinson ESJ; Mendl M Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 331():214-224. PubMed ID: 28549647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Increased conflict-induced slowing, but no differences in conflict-induced positive or negative prediction error learning in patients with schizophrenia. Albrecht MA; Waltz JA; Cavanagh JF; Frank MJ; Gold JM Neuropsychologia; 2019 Feb; 123():131-140. PubMed ID: 29709580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention. Krebs RM; Boehler CN; Egner T; Woldorff MG J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 31(26):9752-9. PubMed ID: 21715640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intention to learn modulates the impact of reward and punishment on sequence learning. Steel A; Baker CI; Stagg CJ Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):8906. PubMed ID: 32483289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias. Kim H; Anderson BA Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of reward and punishment on brain activations associated with inhibitory control in cigarette smokers. Luijten M; O'Connor DA; Rossiter S; Franken IH; Hester R Addiction; 2013 Nov; 108(11):1969-78. PubMed ID: 23773427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do Young Children Modulate Their Cognitive Control? Ambrosi S; Lemaire P; Blaye A Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 27221602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Functional specialization within the striatum along both the dorsal/ventral and anterior/posterior axes during associative learning via reward and punishment. Mattfeld AT; Gluck MA; Stark CE Learn Mem; 2011; 18(11):703-11. PubMed ID: 22021252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]