BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26555839)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Phan K; Mobbs RJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E91-E100. PubMed ID: 26555839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
    Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy.
    Wong AP; Shih P; Smith TR; Slimack NP; Dahdaleh NS; Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; Smith ZA; Scheer JK; Koski TR; Liu JC; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):634-40. PubMed ID: 24239738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
    Soliman MAR; Ali A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
    Soliman HM
    Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery.
    Ang CL; Phak-Boon Tow B; Fook S; Guo CM; Chen JL; Yue WM; Tan SB
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1705-12. PubMed ID: 24094717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
    Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
    Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
    Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous Endoscopic Laminotomy with Flavectomy by Uniportal, Unilateral Approach for the Lumbar Canal or Lateral Recess Stenosis.
    Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Jun JH
    World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e129-e137. PubMed ID: 29425979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.