251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26555849)
1. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test.
Alonzo TA; Pepe MS
Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):2987-3003. PubMed ID: 10544302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual composite reference standards (dCRS) in molecular diagnostic research: A new approach to reduce bias in the presence of Imperfect reference.
Tang S; Hemyari P; Canchola JA; Duncan J
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):951-965. PubMed ID: 29355450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
Hadgu A
Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of screening tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis: bias associated with the patient-infected-status algorithm.
Hadgu A; Dendukuri N; Wang L
Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 22157304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.
Storey HL; Huang Y; Crudder C; Golden A; de los Santos T; Hawkins K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142364. PubMed ID: 26566275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
Valenstein PN
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
