These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26556417)

  • 1. Ensuring Confidentiality of Geocoded Health Data: Assessing Geographic Masking Strategies for Individual-Level Data.
    Zandbergen PA
    Adv Med; 2014; 2014():567049. PubMed ID: 26556417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Daily activity locations k-anonymity for the evaluation of disclosure risk of individual GPS datasets.
    Wang J; Kwan MP
    Int J Health Geogr; 2020 Mar; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 32138736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidentiality considerations for use of social-spatial data on the social determinants of health: Sexual and reproductive health case study.
    Haley DF; Matthews SA; Cooper HLF; Haardörfer R; Adimora AA; Wingood GM; Kramer MR
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Oct; 166():49-56. PubMed ID: 27542102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
    Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Street masking: a network-based geographic mask for easily protecting geoprivacy.
    Swanlund D; Schuurman N; Zandbergen P; Brussoni M
    Int J Health Geogr; 2020 Jul; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 32631351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geocoding in cancer research: a review.
    Rushton G; Armstrong MP; Gittler J; Greene BR; Pavlik CE; West MM; Zimmerman DL
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 30(2 Suppl):S16-24. PubMed ID: 16458786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
    Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.
    Zandbergen PA; Hart TC; Lenzer KE; Camponovo ME
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22469492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reverse geocoding: concerns about patient confidentiality in the display of geospatial health data.
    Brownstein JS; Cassa CA; Kohane IS; Mandl KD
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():905. PubMed ID: 16779192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidentiality concerns with mapping survey data in reproductive health research.
    Sherman JE; Fetters TL
    Stud Fam Plann; 2007 Dec; 38(4):309-21. PubMed ID: 18284045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
    Cayo MR; Talbot TO
    Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misclassification errors from postal code-based geocoding to assign census geography in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Terashima M; Kephart G
    Can J Public Health; 2016 Dec; 107(4-5):e424-e430. PubMed ID: 28026709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the Certainty of Locations Produced by an Address Geocoding System.
    Davis CA; Fonseca FT
    Geoinformatica; 2007; 11(1):103-129. PubMed ID: 32214874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping health data: improved privacy protection with donut method geomasking.
    Hampton KH; Fitch MK; Allshouse WB; Doherty IA; Gesink DC; Leone PA; Serre ML; Miller WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 172(9):1062-9. PubMed ID: 20817785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decentralized and reproducible geocoding and characterization of community and environmental exposures for multisite studies.
    Brokamp C; Wolfe C; Lingren T; Harley J; Ryan P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 29126118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
    Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
    Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The verified neighbor approach to geoprivacy: An improved method for geographic masking.
    Richter W
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 28930296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting Privacy in Large Datasets-First We Assess the Risk; Then We Fuzzy the Data.
    Ursin G; Sen S; Mottu JM; Nygård M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1219-1224. PubMed ID: 28754793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Cortes TR; Silveira IHD; Junger WL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2021; 37(7):e00039321. PubMed ID: 34346979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.