These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26556692)
1. One year of free school fruit in Norway--7 years of follow-up. Bere E; te Velde SJ; Småstuen MC; Twisk J; Klepp KI Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Nov; 12():139. PubMed ID: 26556692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction of a school fruit program is associated with reduced frequency of consumption of unhealthy snacks. Øverby NC; Klepp KI; Bere E Am J Clin Nutr; 2012 Nov; 96(5):1100-3. PubMed ID: 23034961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of 1 y of free school fruit on intake of fruits, vegetables, and unhealthy snacks: 14 y later. Stea TH; Hovdenak IM; Rønnestad J; Rennestraum K; Vik FN; Klepp KI; Bere E Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Dec; 108(6):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 30339182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracking of fruit, vegetables and unhealthy snacks consumption from childhood to adulthood (15 year period): does exposure to a free school fruit programme modify the observed tracking? Hovdenak IM; Stea TH; Twisk J; Te Velde SJ; Klepp KI; Bere E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Feb; 16(1):22. PubMed ID: 30770744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in 10-12 year old's fruit and vegetable intake in Norway from 2001 to 2008 in relation to gender and socioeconomic status - a comparison of two cross-sectional groups. Hilsen M; van Stralen MM; Klepp KI; Bere E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Oct; 8():108. PubMed ID: 21968008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Ending the Nationwide Free School Fruit Scheme on the Intake of Fruits, Vegetables, and Unhealthy Snacks in Norwegian School Children Aged 10-12 Years. Richardsen HK; Bere ET; Stea TH; Klepp KI; Engeset D Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a free healthy school meal on fruit, vegetables and unhealthy snacks intake in Norwegian 10- to 12-year-old children. Vik FN; Heslien KEP; Van Lippevelde W; Øverby NC BMC Public Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):1369. PubMed ID: 32894122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of a comprehensive fruit- and vegetable-promoting school-based intervention in three European countries: the Pro Children Study. Te Velde SJ; Brug J; Wind M; Hildonen C; Bjelland M; Pérez-Rodrigo C; Klepp KI Br J Nutr; 2008 Apr; 99(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 17953787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comprehensive multicomponent school-based educational intervention did not affect fruit and vegetable intake at the 14-year follow-up. Øvrebø B; Stea TH; Te Velde SJ; Bjelland M; Klepp KI; Bere E Prev Med; 2019 Apr; 121():79-85. PubMed ID: 30753861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free school fruit--sustained effect 1 year later. Bere E; Veierød MB; Bjelland M; Klepp KI Health Educ Res; 2006 Apr; 21(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 16219630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Healthy and unhealthy eating at lower secondary school in Norway. Hilsen M; Eikemo TA; Bere E Scand J Public Health; 2010 Nov; 38(5 Suppl):7-12. PubMed ID: 21062834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato. Evans CE; Ransley JK; Christian MS; Greenwood DC; Thomas JD; Cade JE Public Health Nutr; 2013 Jun; 16(6):1073-81. PubMed ID: 23237386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway. Bere E; Hilsen M; Klepp KI Br J Nutr; 2010 Aug; 104(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 20350345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Norwegian School Fruit Programme: evaluating paid vs. no-cost subscriptions. Bere E; Veierød MB; Klepp KI Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):463-70. PubMed ID: 15917042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of free school lunch in the associations between family-environmental factors and children's fruit and vegetable intake in four European countries. Ray C; Roos E; Brug J; Behrendt I; Ehrenblad B; Yngve A; te Velde SJ Public Health Nutr; 2013 Jun; 16(6):1109-17. PubMed ID: 22974579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parental involvement and association with adolescents' fruit and vegetable intake at follow-up: Process evaluation results from the multi-component school-based Boost intervention. Jørgensen SE; Jørgensen TS; Aarestrup AK; Due P; Krølner R Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Oct; 13(1):112. PubMed ID: 27782838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating free school fruit: results from a natural experiment in Norway with representative data. Øvrum A; Bere E Public Health Nutr; 2014 Jun; 17(6):1224-31. PubMed ID: 24050787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to evaluate the effect of seven years of the Norwegian School Fruit Scheme (2007-2014) on fruit, vegetable and snack consumption and weight status: A natural experiment. Hovdenak IM; Stea TH; Magnus P; Krokstad S; Samdal O; Bere E Scand J Public Health; 2021 Jun; 49(4):347-357. PubMed ID: 31533557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of the CATCH (Coordinated Approach to Child's Health) Rainbow Program in Elementary Schools for Change in Fruit and Vegetable Intake. Muzaffar H; Valinskas A; Werner A; Collins N; Regan M Nutrients; 2024 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 39408250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A process and outcome evaluation of an in-class vegetable promotion program. Myers G; Wright S; Blane S; Pratt IS; Pettigrew S Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():182-189. PubMed ID: 29427693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]