These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26556943)
1. Assessing the Practices of Population-Based Birth Defects Surveillance Programs Using the CDC Strategic Framework, 2012. Mai CT; Correa A; Kirby RS; Rosenberg D; Petros M; Fagen MC Public Health Rep; 2015; 130(6):722-30. PubMed ID: 26556943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. Anderka M; Mai CT; Romitti PA; Copeland G; Isenburg J; Feldkamp ML; Krikov S; Rickard R; Olney RS; Canfield MA; Stanton C; Mosley B; Kirby RS BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():925. PubMed ID: 26386816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public Health Practice of Population-Based Birth Defects Surveillance Programs in the United States. Mai CT; Kirby RS; Correa A; Rosenberg D; Petros M; Fagen MC J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(3):E1-8. PubMed ID: 25905668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Status of population-based birth defects surveillance programs before and after the Zika public health response in the United States. Anderka M; Mai CT; M Judson E; Langlois PH; Lupo PJ; Hauser K; Salemi JL; Correia J; A Canfield M; Kirby RS; Birth Defects Res; 2018 Nov; 110(19):1388-1394. PubMed ID: 30230268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinician reviewers in birth defects surveillance programs: survey of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Lin AE; Forrester MB; Cunniff C; Higgins CA; Anderka M Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):781-6. PubMed ID: 17051528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey. Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA; J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013. Johnson NB; Hayes LD; Brown K; Hoo EC; Ethier KA; MMWR Suppl; 2014 Oct; 63(4):3-27. PubMed ID: 25356673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program: 35 years of birth defects surveillance at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Correa-VillaseƱor A; Cragan J; Kucik J; O'Leary L; Siffel C; Williams L Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):617-24. PubMed ID: 14703783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Birth defects interstate data exchange: a battle worth fighting? Cassell C; Mai C; Rickard R Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Nov; 79(11):806-10. PubMed ID: 17990342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating Difficult Decisions in Public Health Surveillance: Striking the Right Balance between Timeliness and Completeness. Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Anjohrin SB; Rutkowski RE; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2015; 42(2):48-61. PubMed ID: 26360106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: an application of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. Sekhobo JP; Druschel CM Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 12037258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services. Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collection, use, and protection of population-based birth defects surveillance data in the united states. Mai CT; Law DJ; Mason CA; McDowell BD; Meyer RE; Musa D; Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Dec; 79(12):811-4. PubMed ID: 18064713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public health surveillance data: legal, policy, ethical, regulatory, and practical issues. Bernstein AB; Sweeney MH; MMWR Suppl; 2012 Jul; 61(3):30-4. PubMed ID: 22832995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss? Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs? Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India. Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida. Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving integration and coordination of funding, technical assistance, and reporting/data collection: recommendations from CDC and USAPI stakeholders. Ka'opua LS; White SF; Rochester PF; Holden DJ Pac Health Dialog; 2011 Mar; 17(1):185-97. PubMed ID: 23008984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of variability in birth defects prevalence rates. Hobbs CA; Hopkins SE; Simmons CJ Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S8-S13. PubMed ID: 11745838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]