These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26558222)
1. Evaluation of patient visual comfort and repeatability of refractive values in non-presbyopic healthy eyes. Segura F; Sanchez-Cano A; Lopez de la Fuente C; Fuentes-Broto L; Pinilla I Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(5):1031-6. PubMed ID: 26558222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study. Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Evaluation of the 3nethra Aberro Handheld Autorefractometer. Perumal S; Venkatramanan S; Rj V; T J; Adithya J; Abraham A; Cherian H J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2022; 17(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 36620713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III. McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements. Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Quantitative Comparison of Multispectral Refraction Topography and Autorefractometer in Young Adults. Liao Y; Yang Z; Li Z; Zeng R; Wang J; Zhang Y; Lan Y Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():715640. PubMed ID: 34589499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of measurements obtained with a ray tracing aberrometer. Piñero DP; Sánchez-Pérez PJ; Alió JL Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 88(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 21666525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer. Wang L; Wang N; Koch DD J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 May; 29(5):970-9. PubMed ID: 12781285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix. Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a Clinical Aberrometer Using Pyramidal Wavefront Sensing. Singh NK; Jaskulski M; Ramasubramanian V; Meyer D; Reed O; Rickert ME; Bradley A; Kollbaum PS Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):733-744. PubMed ID: 31592956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Salmon TO; West RW; Gasser W; Kenmore T Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 12553539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor. Vilaseca M; Arjona M; Pujol J; Peris E; Martínez V Int J Ophthalmol; 2013; 6(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 24195036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia. Salmon TO; van de Pol C Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of a Commercially Available Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Aberrometer in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes. Shetty R; Kochar S; Grover T; Khamar P; Kusumgar P; Sainani K; Sinha Roy A J Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 33(11):769-772. PubMed ID: 29117417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection]. Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Sheppard AL; Davies LN Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction. Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults. Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]