These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26559200)

  • 21. Efficacy of implementation of a 5 scale pediatric triage and acuity scale in pediatric emergency, Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Hindi AA; Al-Akhfash AA; Fareed AM; Alhusainan KS; Algasomy SF; Althowainy IR
    Saudi Med J; 2014 Sep; 35(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 25228183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: A Canadian perspective on emergency department triage.
    J Murray M
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Feb; 15(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12656779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Utilization of an Electronic Triage System by Emergency Department Nurses.
    Alumran A; Alkhaldi O; Aldroorah Z; Alsayegh Z; Alsafwani F; Almaghraby N
    J Multidiscip Healthc; 2020; 13():339-344. PubMed ID: 32280235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Utilizing the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in an oncology urgent care clinic: the university health network experience.
    Trip K; Boloorchi A; Berman H
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2011; 21(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 21462878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. One-two-triage: validation and reliability of a novel triage system for low-resource settings.
    Khan A; Mahadevan SV; Dreyfuss A; Quinn J; Woods J; Somontha K; Strehlow M
    Emerg Med J; 2016 Oct; 33(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 27466347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: testing the mental health categories.
    Brown AM; Clarke DE; Spence J
    Open Access Emerg Med; 2015; 7():79-84. PubMed ID: 27147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inter-rater Reliability of Triages Performed by the Electronic Triage System.
    Pourasghar F; Daemi A; Tabrizi JS; Ala A
    Bull Emerg Trauma; 2015 Oct; 3(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 27162918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interrater Reliability, Accuracy, and Triage Time Pre- and Post-implementation of a Real-Time Electronic Triage Decision-Support Tool.
    McLeod SL; McCarron J; Ahmed T; Grewal K; Mittmann N; Scott S; Ovens H; Garay J; Bullard M; Rowe BH; Dreyer J; Borgundvaag B
    Ann Emerg Med; 2020 Apr; 75(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 31564379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictors of admission to hospital of patients triaged as nonurgent using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Lin D; Worster A
    CJEM; 2013 Nov; 15(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 24176459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analyzing the Usability of the 5-Level Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale By Paramedics in the Prehospital Environment.
    Smith DT; Snyder A; Hollen PJ; Anderson JG; Caterino JM
    J Emerg Nurs; 2015 Nov; 41(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 26001701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators?
    Jiménez JG; Murray MJ; Beveridge R; Pons JP; Cortés EA; Garrigós JB; Ferré MB
    CJEM; 2003 Sep; 5(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 17466139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adjusting weighted kappa for severity of mistriage decreases reported reliability of emergency department triage systems: a comparative study.
    van der Wulp I; van Stel HF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1196-201. PubMed ID: 19398298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are Pediatric Triage Systems Reliable in the Emergency Department?
    Ebrahimi M; Mirhaghi A; Najafi Z; Shafaee H; Hamechizfahm Roudi M
    Emerg Med Int; 2020; 2020():9825730. PubMed ID: 32695517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    CJEM; 2007 Jul; 9(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 17626690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: Interrater Agreement between Two Experienced Nurses by Real-Time Triage and Analysis of Influencing Factors to Disagreement of Triage Levels.
    Park JB; Lee J; Kim YJ; Lee JH; Lim TH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 34(28):e189. PubMed ID: 31327176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.
    van der Wulp I; van Baar ME; Schrijvers AJ
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Jul; 25(7):431-4. PubMed ID: 18573959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of a formal triage scoring system and a quick-look triage approach.
    Betz M; Stempien J; Wilde A; Bryce R
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 23(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 25622182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impacts of the introduction of a triage system in Japan: a time series study.
    Hamamoto J; Yamase H; Yamase Y
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2014 Jul; 22(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 24210955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A determination of emergency department pre-triage times in patients not arriving by ambulance compared to widely used guideline recommendations.
    Betz M; Stempien J; Trivedi S; Bryce R
    CJEM; 2017 Jul; 19(4):265-270. PubMed ID: 27917744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactive triage simulator revealed important variability in both process and outcome of emergency triage.
    Rutschmann OT; Kossovsky M; Geissbühler A; Perneger TV; Vermeulen B; Simon J; Sarasin FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 16713524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.